Skip to content

test & dev: bump deps #380

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 26, 2025
Merged

test & dev: bump deps #380

merged 7 commits into from
Apr 26, 2025

Conversation

lread
Copy link
Collaborator

@lread lread commented Apr 26, 2025

No description provided.

lread added 3 commits April 25, 2025 12:29
These seem to work fine with rewrite-clj locally, the buzz in the chats,
is there might be more changes coming...
@lread
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lread commented Apr 26, 2025

Ah right. I think newest clojurescript/shadow-cljs require some later JDKs.

Will take a peek tomorrow.

Not sure how official the ClojureScript release is. I see it in the changelog, but don't think it has been announce yet?

@lread
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lread commented Apr 26, 2025

Oh. Building the google closure compiler now requires jdk21: google/closure-compiler#4209. But what version does using it require?

But tests are passing for ClojureScript on jdk11 (no longer passing on jdk8).
And shadow-cljs seems to now require jdk21 (from local testing)

lread added 4 commits April 26, 2025 10:20
Allow test-doc to run only clj or cljs tests.

cljs tests now run on jdk11 (was jdk8)
shadow-cljs tests now run on jdk21 (was jdk11)
Was linting with earliest supported jdk, but linting with latest is
better because eastwood will find and report deprecations in latest jdk.
Was jdk8 but Clojurescript now requires jdk11.
@lread lread merged commit d4d4819 into main Apr 26, 2025
84 checks passed
@lread lread deleted the lread/maint-2025-04-25 branch April 26, 2025 17:37
lread added a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2025
* main:
  dev & test: bump deps (#381)
  test & dev: bump deps (#380)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant