-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
Nearby notable things from OpenStreetMap #883
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Does the scope of this issue entail: |
@Bluesir9 (3) Both of the above. Linking from OSM is important so that at the next Nearby search this point is not shown anymore. |
Any thoughts on whether it would be feasible/useful to include this in 2019's PG application? I think it will be a fairly long and involved task, but the benefits look worth the while to me. @maskaravivek @neslihanturan @VojtechDostal |
Woohoo! An interesting idea @nicolas-raoul . My worry is that we lose the cool connection to real items in Wikidata which we have just embraced using Nearby maps and lists. Images uploaded this way would have to be somehow properly tagged - but OSM identifiers are notoriously unstable, so it would be really complicated. Most OSM objects aren't still connected to existing Wikidata items, at least in our country (try this tool to see for yourself how many are still not connected). My thought is that all these types of places belong to Wikidata and will actually be imported sooner or later. Within a few years there will probably be no need to read these kinds of objects from OSM because we'll have them in Wikidata. Also it might make the Nearby query take even longer than it does now which wouldn't be very user-friendly. I've given several reasons why we shouldn't do this but there are of course many pros as well - obviously our dataset would be much richer than it is now. |
This feature would be a really good addition to our app. I am in favor of having this task for 2019's PG application. Having worked with Wikidata APIs for P18 edits, we will have a better clarity of how Wikidata works and we should be able to manage this task well. :) |
@VojtechDostal Many OSM objects are not connected to WIkidata objects because OSM has way more geographical objects than Wikidata. Looking at an OSM maps around me right now, I see dozens of notable places, and almost none of them has a Wikidata item. Even though I am in a country with a strong Wikipedia community writing many local articles. I am sure that Wikidata coverage is very low in countries with a weaker Wikipedia community, for instance the PRC of Guinea. Conakry on OSM and Wikishootme: While I could create a Wikidata item for every hospital on OSM, there are multiple problems:
|
I wrote this Overpass API query:
Paste it into https://overpass-turbo.eu , press It already provides results, but it could be improved further by catching:
The API can be called directly like this:
Which returns:
|
Wow, nice! 👍 |
The next steps could be: Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3Edit OpenStreetMap to link from the OpenStreetMap node to the URL of the uploaded Commons picture. |
Wikidata only has 2000 embassies, while OpenStreetMap has 8000.
All embassies are notable enough to have their picture in Commons.
OSM has gotten quite good at linking to Wikidata, so an OSM item without a Wikidata link probably is not in Wikidata yet.
So, let's display them in Nearby, as soon as technically possible.
An advantage of OSM is that the items are all current (all buildings still exist in the present day, if you go there you will have something to take a picture of).
When the user uploads a picture,
I believe OSM items with these tags are notable (every instance is worth having its picture in Commons):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: