Are the authors of this going to discuss anything here, or are we talking to a wall?

[tuxwise]

So far, I see all issues not supportive of implementation details being turned into discussions.

Also, the creation of multiple discussion categories, and fundamental criticism being filed away in a separate "Open feedback, suggestions" drawer, as if it was barely on topic.

Also, "context and questions" by the authors, in pinned postings that request to create new posts to answer their lists of pre-determined questions. And those pinned "discussion" postings are locked as well, to prevent any direct replies to them.

This is starting to feel disrespectful.

[ccjocelyn]

Thank you for the feedback. We took some time to digest what we were seeing so far to make sure we could respond as effectively as possible.

As for your comment about how our context and questions are pinned and locked, the intention of locking them is simply so that individuals can create new threads for each topic they’d like to address, but we’re open to feedback on this format. A couple of options would be: 1) unlocking the initial posts so that folks can comment, but it may get a bit messier or 2) we can help create individual open threads for each question.

Also, "context and questions" by the authors, in pinned postings that request to create new posts to answer their lists of pre-determined questions. And those pinned "discussion" postings are locked as well, to prevent any direct replies to them.