Title: CSS Display Module Level 3
Status: ED
Status Text: A preliminary implementation report is available. Further tests will be added during the CR period.
Work Status: Refining
ED: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display/
Shortname: css-display
Group: csswg
Level: 3
TR: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-display-3/
Previous Version: https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/CR-css-display-3-20190711/
Previous Version: https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-display-3-20180828/
Previous Version: https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/WD-css-display-3-20180809/
Previous Version: https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/WD-css-display-3-20180420/
Previous Version: https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-display-3-20170720/
Previous Version: https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-display-3-20170126/
Previous Version: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-display-3-20151015/
Previous Version: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-display-3-20150721/
Previous Version: https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css-display-3-20140911/
Editor: Tab Atkins Jr., Google, http://xanthir.com/contact/, w3cid 42199
Editor: Elika J. Etemad / fantasai, Invited Expert, http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact, w3cid 35400
Abstract: This module describes how the CSS formatting box tree is generated from the document element tree and defines the 'display' property that controls it.
Ignored Terms: display-model, display-role, table row group box, absolutely positioned, table formatting context
At Risk: Application of ''::first-letter'' in the presence of run-ins
At Risk: ''display: run-in''
At Risk: All multi-keyword values of 'display'
spec:css-break-3; type:dfn; text:fragment;
spec:css2;
type:property; text:overflow;
spec: html;
type: dfn; text: rendered legend
type: element; text: a
spec:css-pseudo-4; type:selector;
text: ::first-letter
text: ::first-line
text: ::before
text: ::after
spec: svg2;
type:dfn;
text: container element
text: text content child element
text: renderable element
text: non-rendered element
text: rendered element
text: presentation attribute
Introduction
This section is normative.
CSS takes a source document, organized as
a tree
of elements
and text nodes,
and renders it onto a canvas
(such as your screen, a piece of paper, or an audio stream).
(Some source documents start from more complex trees,
such as the DOM,
which can have comment nodes
and other types of things.
For the purposes of CSS,
all of these additional types of nodes are ignored,
as if they didn't exist.)
To do this, it generates an intermediary structure,
the box tree,
which represents the formatting structure of the rendered document.
Each box in the box tree
represents its corresponding [=CSS/element=] (or pseudo-element)
in space and/or time on the canvas,
while each text run in the box tree
likewise represents the contents of its corresponding text nodes.
To create the box tree,
CSS first uses cascading and inheritance,
to assign a computed value for each CSS property
to each [=CSS/element=] and text node in the source tree.
(See [[!CSS3-CASCADE]].)
Then, for each [=CSS/element=],
CSS generates zero or more boxes
as specified by that element's 'display' property.
Typically, an element generates a single box,
the principal box,
which represents itself and contains its contents in the box tree.
However, some 'display' values
(e.g. ''display: list-item'')
generate more than one box
(e.g. a principal block box and a child marker box).
And some values
(such as ''display/none'' or ''display/contents'')
cause the [=CSS/element=] and/or its descendants to not generate any boxes at all.
Boxes are often referred to by their 'display' type--
e.g. a box generated by an element with ''display: block'' is called a “block box” or just a “block”.
A box is assigned the same styles as its generating [=CSS/element=], unless otherwise indicated.
In general, inherited properties are assigned to the principal box,
and then inherit through the box tree
to any other boxes generated by the same element.
Non-inherited properties default to applying to the principal box,
but when the element generates multiple boxes,
are sometimes defined to apply to a different box:
for example, the 'border' properties applied to a table element
are applied to its table grid box,
not to its principal table wrapper box.
If the value computation process alters the styles of those boxes,
and the element's style is requested
(such as through {{getComputedStyle()}}),
the element reflects,
for each property,
the value from the box to which that property was applied.
Similarly, each contiguous sequence of sibling text nodes generates a text run
containing their text contents,
which is assigned the same styles as the generating text nodes.
If the sequence contains no text, however, it does not generate a text run.
In constructing the box tree,
boxes generated by an element are descendants of
the principal box of any ancestor elements.
In the general case,
the direct parent box
of an element’s principal box
is the principal box
of its nearest ancestor element that generates a box;
however, there are some exceptions,
such as for ''run-in'' boxes,
display types (like tables) that generate multiple container boxes,
and intervening anonymous boxes.
An anonymous box is a box that is not associated with any element.
Anonymous boxes are generated in certain circumstances
to fix up the box tree when it requires a particular nested structure
that is not provided by the boxes generated from the element tree.
For example, a table cell box
requires a particular type of parent box (the table row box),
and will generate an anonymous table row box around itself
if its parent is not a table row box.
(See [[CSS2]] § 17.2.1.)
Unlike element-generated boxes, whose styles inherit strictly through the element tree,
anonymous boxes (which only exist in the box tree)
inherit through their box tree parentage.
In the course of layout,
boxes and text runs can be broken into multiple fragments.
This happens, for example, when an inline box and/or text run
is broken across lines,
or when a block box is broken across pages or columns,
in a process called fragmentation.
It can also happen due to bidi reordering of text
(see [[css-writing-modes-3#bidi-algo|Applying the Bidirectional Reordering Algorithm]]
in [[css-writing-modes-3#text-direction|CSS Writing Modes]])
or higher-level display type box splitting,
e.g. block-in-inline splitting
(see CSS2§9.2)
or column-spanner-in-block splitting
(see CSS Multi-column Layout).
A box therefore consists of one or more box fragments,
and a text run consists of one or more text fragments.
See [[CSS3-BREAK]] for more information on fragmentation.
Note: Many of the CSS specs were written before this terminology was ironed out,
or refer to things incorrectly,
so view older specs with caution when they're using these terms.
It should be possible to infer from context which term they really mean.
Please report errors in specs when you find them,
so they can be corrected.
Note: Further information on the “aural” box tree
and its interaction with the 'display' property
can be found in the CSS Speech Module.
[[!CSS-SPEECH-1]]
Module interactions
This module replaces and extends the definition of the 'display' property defined in [[!CSS2]] section 9.2.4.
None of the properties in this module apply to the ::first-line
or ::first-letter
pseudo-elements.
Value Definitions
This specification follows the CSS property definition conventions from [[!CSS2]]
using the value definition syntax from [[!CSS-VALUES-3]].
Value types not defined in this specification are defined in CSS Values & Units [[!CSS-VALUES-3]].
Combination with other CSS modules may expand the definitions of these value types.
In addition to the property-specific values listed in their definitions,
all properties defined in this specification
also accept the CSS-wide keywords keywords as their property value.
For readability they have not been repeated explicitly.
Box Layout Modes: the 'display' property
Name: display
Value: [ <> || <> ] | <> | <> | <> | <>
Initial: inline
Applies to: all elements
Inherited: no
Computed value: see prose in a variety of specs
Animation type: not animatable
User Agents are expected to support this property on all media, including non-visual ones.
The 'display' property defines an element's display type,
which consists of the two basic qualities of how an element generates boxes:
* the inner display type,
which defines (if it is a non-replaced element) the kind of formatting context it generates,
dictating how its descendant boxes are laid out.
(The inner display of a replaced element is outside the scope of CSS.)
* the outer display type,
which dictates how the [=principal box=] itself participates in flow layout.
Text runs have no display type.
Some 'display' values have additional side-effects:
such as ''list-item'', which also generates a ''::marker'' pseudo-element,
and ''display/none'', which causes the element's entire subtree to be left out of the box tree.
The 'display' property has no effect on an element’s semantics:
these are defined by the
document language and
are not affected by CSS.
Aside from the ''display/none'' value,
which also affects the aural/speech output [[!CSS-SPEECH-1]]
and interactivity of an element and its descendants,
the 'display' property only affects visual layout:
its purpose is to allow designers freedom
to change the layout behavior of an element
without affecting the underlying document semantics.
Values are defined as follows:
<display-outside> = block | inline | run-in
<display-inside> = flow | flow-root | table | flex | grid | ruby
<display-listitem> = <>? && [ flow | flow-root ]? && list-item
<display-internal> = table-row-group | table-header-group |
table-footer-group | table-row | table-cell |
table-column-group | table-column | table-caption |
ruby-base | ruby-text | ruby-base-container |
ruby-text-container
<display-box> = contents | none
<display-legacy> = inline-block | inline-table | inline-flex | inline-grid
The following informative table summarizes the values of 'display':
Note: Following the precedence rules of “most backwards-compatible, then shortest”,
serialization of equivalent 'display' values uses the “Short 'display'” column.
[[CSSOM]]
Outer Display Roles for Flow Layout: the ''block'', ''inline'', and ''run-in'' keywords
The <> keywords specify the element's outer display type,
which is essentially its [=principal box’s=] role in flow layout.
They are defined as follows:
- block
-
The element generates a box that is
block-level
when placed in flow layout. [[!CSS2]]
- inline
-
The element generates a box that is
inline-level
when placed in flow layout. [[!CSS2]]
- run-in
-
The element generates an run-in box,
which is a type of inline-level box
with special behavior that attempts to merge it into a subsequent block container.
See [[#run-in-layout]] for details.
If a <> value is specified but <> is omitted,
the element's inner display type defaults to ''flow''.
Inner Display Layout Models: the ''flow'', ''flow-root'', ''table'', ''flex'', ''grid'', and ''ruby'' keywords
The <> keywords specify the element's inner display type,
which defines the type of formatting context that lays out its contents
(assuming it is a non-replaced element).
They are defined as follows:
- flow
-
The element lays out its contents using flow layout
(block-and-inline layout).
If its outer display type is ''inline'' or ''run-in'',
and it is participating in a
block
or inline
formatting context,
then it generates an inline box.
Otherwise it generates a block container box.
Depending on the value of other properties (such as 'position', 'float', or 'overflow')
and whether it is itself participating in a block or inline formatting context,
it either establishes a new block formatting context for its contents
or integrates its contents into its parent formatting context.
See CSS2.1 Chapter 9. [[!CSS2]]
A block container that establishes a new block formatting context
is considered to have a used inner display type of ''flow-root''.
- flow-root
-
The element generates a block container box,
and lays out its contents using flow layout.
It always establishes a new block formatting context for its contents. [[!CSS2]]
- table
-
The element generates a principal table wrapper box
that establishes a block formatting context,
and which contains
an additionally-generated table grid box
that establishes a table formatting context. [[!CSS2]]
- flex
-
The element generates a principal flex container box
and establishes a flex formatting context. [[!CSS3-FLEXBOX]]
- grid
-
The element generates a principal grid container box,
and establishes a grid formatting context. [[!CSS3-GRID-LAYOUT]]
- ruby
-
The element generates a ruby container box
and establishes a ruby formatting context
in addition to integrating its base-level contents
into its parent formatting context
(if it is inline)
or generating a wrapper box of the appropriate outer display type
(if it is not). [[!CSS3RUBY]]
If a <> value is specified but <> is omitted,
the element's outer display type defaults to ''block''--
except for ''ruby'', which defaults to ''inline''.
Generating Marker Boxes: the ''list-item'' keyword
The list-item keyword
causes the element to generate a ''::marker'' pseudo-element [[!CSS-PSEUDO-4]]
with the content specified by its 'list-style' properties
(CSS 2.1§12.5 Lists) [[!CSS2]]
together with a principal box of the specified type for its own contents.
If no inner display type value is specified,
the principal box's inner display type defaults to ''flow''.
If no outer display type value is specified,
the principal box's outer display type defaults to ''block''.
Note: In this level, as restricted in the grammar,
list-items are limited to the Flow Layout display types
(''block''/''inline''/''run-in'' with ''flow''/''flow-root'' inner types).
This restriction may be relaxed in a future level of this module.
Layout-Internal Display Types: the ''table-*'' and ''ruby-*'' keywords
Some layout models, such as ''table'' and ''ruby'',
have a complex internal structure,
with several different roles that their children and descendants can fill.
This section defines those “layout-internal” 'display' values,
which only have meaning within that particular layout mode.
Unless otherwise specified,
both the inner display type and the outer display type
of elements using these 'display' values
are set to the given keyword.
The <> keywords are defined as follows:
- table-row-group, table-header-group, table-footer-group, table-row, table-cell, table-column-group, table-column
-
The element is an internal table element.
It generates the appropriate internal table box
which participates in a table formatting context.
See CSS2§17.2 [[!CSS2]].
''table-cell'' boxes have a ''flow-root'' inner display type.
- table-caption
-
The element generates a table caption box,
which is a block box with special behavior with respect to table and table wrapper boxes.
See CSS2§17.2 [[!CSS2]].
''table-caption'' boxes have a ''flow-root'' inner display type.
-
- ruby-base, ruby-text, ruby-base-container, ruby-text-container
-
The element is an internal ruby element.
It generates the appropriate internal ruby box
which participates in a ruby formatting context. [[!CSS3RUBY]]
''ruby-base'' and ''ruby-text'' have a ''flow'' inner display type.
Boxes with layout-specific display types generate anonymous wrapper boxes around themselves
when placed in an incompatible parent,
as defined by their respective specifications.
For example, Table Layout requires that a ''table-cell'' box
must have a ''table-row'' parent box.
If it is misparented, like so:
<div style="display:block;">
<div style="display:table-cell">...</div>
</div>
It will generate wrapper boxes around itself,
producing a structure like:
block box
└anonymous table box
└anonymous table-row-group box
└anonymous table-row box
└table-cell box
Even if the parent is another
internal table element,
if it's not the
correct one,
wrapper boxes will be generated.
For example, in the following markup:
<div style="display:table;">
<div style="display:table-row">
<div style="display:table-cell">...</div>
</div>
</div>
Anonymous wrapper box generation will produce:
table box
└anonymous table-row-group box
└table-row box
└table-cell box
This "fix-up" ensures that table layout has a predictable structure to operate on.
Box Generation: the ''display/none'' and ''display/contents'' keywords
While 'display' can control the types of boxes an element will generate,
it can also control whether an element will generate any boxes at all.
The <> keywords are defined as follows:
- contents
-
The element itself does not generate any boxes,
but its children and pseudo-elements still generate boxes and text runs as normal.
For the purposes of box generation and layout,
the element must be treated as if it had been replaced in the [=element tree=]
by its contents
(including both its source-document children and its pseudo-elements,
such as ''::before'' and ''::after'' pseudo-elements,
which are generated before/after the element's children as normal).
Note: As only the box tree is affected,
any semantics based on the document tree,
such as selector-matching, event handling,
and property inheritance,
are not affected.
As of writing, however,
this is not implemented correctly in major browsers,
so using this feature on the Web must be done with care
as it can prevent accessibility tools
from accessing the element’s semantics.
This value computes to ''display: none'' on replaced elements
and other elements whose rendering is not entirely controlled by CSS;
see [[#unbox]] for details.
Note: Replaced elements and form controls are treated specially
because removing only the element’s own generating box
is a more-or-less undefined operation.
As this behavior may be refined if use cases
(and more precise rendering models) develop,
authors should use ''display: none'' rather than ''display: contents''
on such elements for forward-compatibility.
- none
-
The [=CSS/element=] and its descendants generate no boxes or text runs.
Similarly, if a text node is defined to behave as ''display: none'',
it generates no text runs.
Elements with either of these values do not have inner or outer display types,
because they don't generate any boxes at all.
Note: As these values cause affected elements to not generate a box,
anonymous box generation rules will ignore the elided elements entirely,
as if they did not exist in the box tree.
Markup-based relationships, however, are not affected by these values,
as they are solely rendering-time effects.
For example,
although they may affect which table cell appears in a column,
they do not affect which table cell is associated with a particular column element.
Similarly, they cannot affect which HTML <{summary}> element is associated with a particular table
or whether a <{legend}> is considered to be labelling the contents of a particular <{fieldset}>.
Precomposed Inline-level Display Values
CSS level 2 used a single-keyword syntax for 'display',
requiring separate keywords for block-level and inline-level variants of the same layout mode.
These <> keywords map as follows:
- inline-block
-
Behaves as ''inline flow-root''.
- inline-table
-
Behaves as ''inline table''.
- inline-flex
-
Behaves as ''inline flex''.
- inline-grid
-
Behaves as ''inline grid''.
Some layout effects require blockification
or inlinification of the box type,
which sets the box’s outer display type
to ''block'' or ''inline'' (respectively).
(This has no effect on display types that generate no box at all,
such as ''display/none'' or ''display/contents''.)
Additionally:
* If a ''block flow'' box is inlinified,
its inner display type is set to ''flow-root''
so that it remains a block container.
* If an ''inline flow'' box is inlinified,
it recursively inlinifies all of its in-flow children,
so that no block-level descendants
break up the inline formatting context in which it participates.
* For legacy reasons,
if an ''inline flow-root'' box
(aka ''inline-block'')
is blockified,
it becomes a ''block'' box
(losing its ''flow-root'' nature).
For consistency,
a ''run-in flow-root'' box
also [=blockifies=]
to a ''block'' box.
* If a [=layout-internal=] box is blockified,
its [=inner display type=] converts to ''flow''
so that it becomes a block container.
Inlinification has no effect on layout-internal boxes.
(However, placement in such an inline context
will typically cause them to be wrapped
in an appropriately-typed anonymous inline-level box.)
Note: There are two methods used to fix up box types when a box is mismatched to its context.
One is transformation of the computed value of 'display', such as blockification and inlinification described here.
The other, taking place during [[#intro|box tree construction]] (after computed values have been determined),
is the creation of intermediary anonymous boxes,
such as happens in tables,
[[css-ruby-1#box-fixup|ruby]],
and flow layout.
Some examples of computed-value fixup include:
- Absolute positioning or floating an element blockifies the box’s display type. [[CSS2]]
- Containment in a ruby container inlinifies the box’s display type, as described in [[CSS3RUBY]].
- A parent with a ''grid'' or ''flex'' 'display' value blockifies the box’s display type. [[CSS3-GRID-LAYOUT]] [[CSS3-FLEXBOX]]
The root element’s display type is always blockified.
Additionally, a 'display' of ''display/contents'' computes to ''block'' on the root element.
Run-In Layout
A run-in box
is a box that merges into a block that comes after it,
inserting itself at the beginning of that block’s inline-level content.
This is useful for formatting compact headlines, definitions, and other similar things,
where the appropriate DOM structure is to have a headline preceding the following prose,
but the desired display is an inline headline laying out with the text.
For example, dictionary definitions are often formatted so that the word is inline with the definition:
<dl class='dict'>
<dt>dictionary
<dd>a book that lists the words of a language in alphabetical
order and gives their meaning, or that gives the equivalent
words in a different language.
<dt>glossary
<dd>an alphabetical list of terms or words found in or relating
to a specific subject, text, or dialect, with explanations; a
brief dictionary.
</dl>
<style>
.dict > dt {
display: run-in;
}
.dict > dt::after {
content: ": "
}
</style>
Which is formatted as:
dictionary: a book that lists the words of a language
in alphabetical order and explains their meaning.
glossary: an alphabetical list of terms or words found
in or relating to a specific subject, text, or dialect,
with explanations; a brief dictionary.
A run-in box behaves exactly as any other inline-level box, except:
-
A run-in box with a ''flow'' inner display type inlinifies its contents.
-
If a run-in sequence is immediately followed by a block box
that does not establish a new block formatting context,
it is inserted as direct children of that block box:
after its ''::marker'' pseudo-element's boxes (if any),
but preceding any other boxes generated by the contents of the block
(including the box generated by the ''::before'' pseudo-element, if any).
This re-parenting recurses if possible
(so that the run-in effectively becomes
part of the deepest subsequent “paragraph” in its formatting context,
collecting newly-adjacent run-ins as it goes).
The reparented content is then formatted as if originally parented there.
Note that only layout is affected, not inheritance,
because property inheritance for non-anonymous boxes is based only on the element tree.
-
Otherwise
(if the run-in sequence is not followed by such a block),
an anonymous block box is generated around the run-in sequence
and all immediately following inline-level content
(up to, but not including, the next run-in sequence, if any).
A run-in sequence is a maximal sequence of consecutive sibling run-in boxes
and intervening white space and/or out-of-flow boxes.
Note: This statement implies that out-of-flow boxes are reparented
if they are between two run-in boxes.
Another alternative would be to leave behind the intervening out-of-flow boxes,
or to have out-of-flow boxes impede the running-in of earlier boxes.
Implementers and authors are encouraged to contact the CSSWG if they have a preferred behavior, as this one was picked somewhat at random.
This fixup occurs before the anonymous block and inline box fixup described in CSS2§9.2,
and affects the determination of the first formatted line
of the affected elements
as if the run-in sequence were originally
in its final location in the box tree.
Note: As the earliest run-in represents the first text on the first formatted line of its containing block,
a ''::first-letter'' pseudo-element applied to that block element
selects the first letter of the run-in,
rather than the first letter of its own contents.
Note: This run-in model is slightly different from the one proposed in earlier revisions of [[!CSS2]].
Appendix A: Glossary
The following terms are defined here for convenience:
- principal box
-
When an [=CSS/element=] generates one or more [=boxes=],
one of them is the [=principal box=],
which contains its descendant boxes and generated content,
and is also the box involved in any positioning scheme.
Some elements may generate additional boxes in addition to the principal box
(such as ''display/list-item'' elements,
which generate an additional marker box,
or ''display/table'' elements,
which generate a [=principal box|principal=] [=table wrapper box=]
and an additional [=table grid box=]).
These additional boxes are placed with respect to the principal box.
- inline-level
-
Content that participates in inline layout.
Specifically, inline-level boxes and [=text runs=].
- block-level
-
Content that participates in block layout.
Specifically, block-level boxes.
- inline box
-
A non-replaced inline-level box whose inner display type is ''flow''.
The contents of an inline box participate in the same inline formatting context as the inline box itself.
- inline
-
Used as a shorthand for inline box or inline-level box
where unambiguous,
or as an adjective meaning inline-level.
The latter usage is deprecated.
- atomic inline
-
An inline-level box that is replaced (such as an image)
or that establishes a new formatting context (such as an ''inline-block'' or ''inline-table'')
and cannot split across lines
(as inline boxes and ruby containers can).
Any inline-level box whose inner display type is not ''flow''
establishes a new formatting context of the specified inner display type.
- block container
-
A block container either contains only inline-level boxes
participating in an inline formatting context,
or contains only block-level boxes
participating in a block formatting context
(possibly generating anonymous block boxes to ensure this constraint,
as defined in CSS2§9.2.1.1).
A block container that contains only inline-level content
establishes a new inline formatting context.
The element then also generates a root inline box
which wraps all of its inline content.
Note, this root inline box concept
effectively replaces the "anonymous inline element" concept
introduced in CSS2§9.2.2.1.
A block container establishes a new block formatting context
if its parent formatting context is not a block formatting context;
otherwise, when participating in a block formatting context itself,
it either establishes a new block formatting context for its contents
or continues the one in which it participates,
as determined by the constraints of other properties
(such as 'overflow' or 'align-content').
Note: A block container box can both establish a block formatting context
and an inline formatting context simultaneously.
- block box
-
A block-level box that is also a block container.
Note: Not all block container boxes are block-level boxes:
non-replaced inline blocks and non-replaced table cells,
for example, are block containers
but not block-level boxes.
Similarly, not all block-level boxes are block containers:
block-level replaced elements (''display: block'')
and flex containers (''display: flex''), for example,
are not block containers.
- block
-
Used as a shorthand for block box, block-level box, or block container box,
where unambiguous.
- replaced element
-
An element whose content is outside the scope of the CSS formatting model,
such as an image or embedded document.
For example, the content of the HTML <{img}> element
is often replaced by the image that its <{img/src}> attribute designates.
Replaced elements often have intrinsic dimensions:
an intrinsic width, an intrinsic height, and an intrinsic ratio.
For example, a bitmap image has an intrinsic width and an intrinsic height specified in absolute units
(from which the intrinsic ratio can obviously be determined).
On the other hand, other documents may not have any intrinsic dimensions
(for example, a blank HTML document).
User agents may consider a replaced element to not have any intrinsic dimensions
if it is believed that those dimensions could leak sensitive information to a third party.
For example, if an HTML document changed intrinsic size depending on the user's bank balance,
then the UA might want to act as if that resource had no intrinsic dimensions.
The content of replaced elements is not considered in the CSS formatting model;
however, their intrinsic dimensions are used in various layout calculations.
A non-replaced element is one that is not replaced,
i.e. whose rendering is dictated by the CSS model.
- containing block
-
A rectangle that forms the basis of sizing and positioning
for the [=boxes=] associated with it.
Notably, a [=containing block=] is not a [=box=]
(it is a rectangle),
however it is often derived from the dimensions of a [=box=].
Each [=box=] is given a position with respect to its [=containing block=],
but it is not confined by this [=containing block=];
it can [=overflow=].
The phrase “a box’s containing block” means
“the [=containing block=] in which the box lives,”
not the one it generates.
In general, the [=edges=] of a [=box=]
act as the [=containing block=] for descendant boxes;
we say that a box “establishes”
the [=containing block=] for its descendants.
If properties of a [=containing block=] are referenced,
they reference the values on the [=box=] that generated the [=containing block=].
(For the initial containing block,
values are taken from the root element
unless otherwise specified.)
See [[CSS2]] Section 9.1.2
and Section 10.1
and [[CSS-POSITION-3#def-cb]] for details.
- containing block chain
-
A sequence of successive containing blocks
that form an ancestor-descendant chain
through the containing block relation.
For example, an inline box’s containing block is the content box of its closest block container ancestor;
if that block container is an in-flow block,
then its containing block is formed by its parent block container;
if that grandparent block container is absolutely positioned,
then its containing block is the padding edges of its closest positioned ancestor (not necessarily its parent),
and so on up to the initial containing block.
- initial containing block
-
The containing block of the root element.
See CSS2.1§10.1 for continuous media;
and [[!CSS3PAGE]] for paged media.
- formatting context
-
A formatting context is the environment
into which a set of related boxes are laid out.
Different [=formatting contexts=] lay out their boxes
according to different rules.
For example, a flex formatting context
lays out boxes according to the flex layout rules [[CSS3-FLEXBOX]],
whereas a block formatting context
lays out boxes according to the block-and-inline layout rules [[CSS2]].
Additionally, some types of [=formatting contexts=] interleave and co-exist:
for example, an [=inline formatting context=] exists within
and interacts with the [=block formatting context=]
of the element that establishes it,
and a [=ruby container=] overlays a [=ruby formatting context=]
over the [=inline formatting context=] in which its [=ruby base container=] participates.
A box either establishes a new [=independent formatting context=]
or continues the [=formatting context=] of its containing block.
In some cases,
it might additionally establish a new (non-independent) co-existing formatting context.
Unless otherwise specified, however,
establishing a new formatting context
creates an independent formatting context.
The type of formatting context established by the box
is determined by its inner display type.
E.g. a grid container establishes a new grid formatting context,
a ruby container establishes a new ruby formatting context,
and a block container can establish a new block formatting context
and/or a new inline formatting context.
See the 'display' property.
- independent formatting context
-
When a box establishes an independent formatting context
(whether that [=formatting context=] is of the same type as its parent or not),
it essentially creates a new, independent layout environment:
except through the sizing of the box itself,
the layout of its descendants is (generally)
not affected by the the rules and contents of
the [=formatting context=] outside the box, and vice versa.
For example, in a block formatting context,
floated boxes affect the layout of surrounding boxes.
But their effects do not escape their formatting context:
the box establishing their formatting context grows to fully contain them,
and floats from outside that box
are not allowed to protrude into and affect the contents
inside the box.
As another example, margins do not collapse across [=formatting context=] boundaries.
Exclusions are able to affect content across [=independent formatting context=] boundaries.
(At time of writing, they are the only layout feature that can.)
[[CSS3-EXCLUSIONS]]
Certain properties can force a box to
establish an independent formatting context
in cases where it wouldn't ordinarily.
For example,
making a box out-of-flow
causes it to blockify as well as to [=establish an independent formatting context=].
As another example,
certain values of the 'contain' property
can cause a box to establish an independent formatting context.
Turning a block into a scroll container
will cause it to establish an independent formatting context;
however turning a subgrid into a scroll container will not--
it continues to act as a subgrid,
with its contents participating in the layout of its parent grid container.
A [=block box=] that [=establishes an independent formatting context=]
establishes a new [=block formatting context=] for its contents.
In most other cases,
forcing a box to [=establish an independent formatting context=] is a no-op--
either the box already establishes an independent formatting context
(e.g. flex containers),
or it's not possible to establish a totally independent new formatting context on that type of box
(e.g. non-replaced inline boxes).
- block formatting context
- inline formatting context
-
[=block formatting context|Block=] and [=inline formatting contexts=] are defined in
CSS 2.1 Section 9.4.
[=Inline formatting contexts=] exist within
(are part of their containing)
[=block formatting contexts=];
for example, line boxes belonging to the [=inline formatting context=]
interact with floats belonging to the [=block formatting context=].
- block formatting context root
-
A block container
that establishes a new block formatting context.
- BFC
-
Abbreviation for block formatting context or
block formatting context root.
Has various informal definitions referring to boxes which
contain internal floats, exclude external floats, and suppress margin collapsing,
and may therefore refer specifically to one of:
* a block container
that establishes a new block formatting context for its contents
* a block box (i.e. a block-level block container)
that establishes a [=block formatting context=] for its contents
(as distinguished from a block box which does not)
* (very loosely) any block-level box that establishes a new [=formatting context=]
(other than an inline formatting context)
- out-of-flow
- in-flow
-
A box is out-of-flow if it is
extracted from its expected position and interaction with surrounding content
and laid out using a different paradigm
outside the normal flow of content in its parent formatting context.
This occurs if the box is floated (via 'float')
or [=absolutely positioned=] (via 'position').
A box is in-flow if it is not out-of-flow.
Note: Some [=formatting contexts=] inhibit floating,
so that an element with ''float: left'' is not necessarily out-of-flow.
- document order
-
The order in which boxes or content occurs in the document
(which can be different from the order in which it appears for rendering).
For the purpose of determining the relative order of pseudo-elements,
the box-tree order is used,
see [[css-pseudo-4#treelike]].
See [[!CSS2]] Chapter 9 for a fuller definition of these terms.
Appendix B: Effects of ''display: contents'' on Unusual Elements
This section is (currently) non-normative.
Some elements aren't rendered purely by CSS box concepts;
for example, replaced elements (such as <{img}>),
many form controls (such as <{input}>),
and SVG elements.
This appendix defines how they interact with ''display: contents''.
HTML Elements {#unbox-html}
-----------------------------
: <{br}>
: <{wbr}>
: <{meter}>
: <{progress}>
: <{canvas}>
: <{embed}>
: <{object}>
: <{audio}>
: <{iframe}>
: <{img}>
: <{video}>
: <{frame}>
: <{frameset}>
: <{input}>
: <{textarea}>
: <{select}>
::
''display: contents'' computes to ''display: none''.
: <{legend}>
::
Per HTML, a <{legend}> with ''display: contents'' is not a [=rendered legend=],
so it does not have magical display behavior.
(Thus, it reacts to ''display: contents'' normally.)
: <{button}>
: <{details}>
: <{fieldset}>
::
These elements don't have any special behavior;
''display: contents'' simply removes their [=principal box=],
and their contents render as normal.
: any other HTML element
::
Behaves as normal for ''display: contents''.
SVG Elements {#unbox-svg}
---------------------------
: An <{svg}> element that has CSS box layout
(this includes all <{svg}> whose parent is an HTML element,
as well as document root elements)
::
''display: contents'' computes to ''display: none''.
: All other SVG [=container elements=] that are also [=renderable elements=]
: SVG [=text content child elements=]
: <{use}>
::
''display: contents'' strips the element from the formatting tree,
and hoists its contents up to display in its place.
These contents include the shadow-DOM content for <{use}>.
: any other SVG elements
::
''display: contents'' computes to ''display: none''.
The intention here is that
the ''display: none'' behavior applies
whenever the "rendering context" inside the element
is different than the context outside of it.
If the element's child elements would not be valid children
of the element's parent,
you cannot simply hoist them up the formatting tree.
For example, text content and text formatting elements in SVG
require a <{text}> element context;
if you remove a <{text}>,
its child text content and elements are no longer valid.
For that reason, ''display: contents'' on <{text}>
prevents the entire text element from being rendered.
In contrast, any valid content inside a <{tspan}> or <{textPath}>
is also valid content inside the parent text formatting context,
so the hoisting behavior applies for these elements.
Similarly, if hoisting would convert the children from
[=non-rendered elements=]
(e.g., a shape inside a <{pattern}> or <{symbol}>)
to [=rendered elements=]
(e.g., a shape that is a direct child of the <{svg}>),
that is an invalid change of rendering context.
Never-rendered container elements therefore cannot be "un-boxed"
by ''display: contents''.
When an element is stripped from the formatting tree,
then any SVG attributes on that element
that control layout and visual formatting
are ignored when rendering the contents.
However, SVG [=presentation attributes=]--
which map to CSS properties--
continue to affect value processing and inheritance [[CSS3-CASCADE]];
thus such attributes can affect
the layout and visual formatting of the element’s descendants
by influencing the values of such properties on those descendants.
MathML Elements {#unbox-mathml}
-------------------------------
For all MathML elements,
''display: contents'' computes to ''display: none''.
Appendix C: Box Construction Guidelines for Spec Authors
This section is non-normative guidance for specification authors.
* A box cannot be blockified and inlinified at the same time;
if such a thing would occur,
define which wins over the other.
* Non-principal non-anonymous boxes can't be blockified:
blockification affects the element’s computed values
and thus determines the type of its principal box.
* Boxes which blockify their contents
can't directly contain inline-level content;
any boxes or text runs generated within such an element
must be blockified
or wrapped in an anonymous block container.
* Boxes which inlinify their contents
can't directly contain block-level boxes;
any boxes generated within such an element
must be inline-level.
* Boxes that fundamentally cannot establish an [=independent formatting context=]
(such as non-replaced inlines)
must not be asked to [=establish an independent formatting context=].
Blockify them first,
or otherwise change their box type to one that can establish an [=independent formatting context=].
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the many people who have attempted to separate out the disparate details of box generation over the years,
most particularly Bert Bos,
whose last attempt with 'display-model' and 'display-role' didn't get anywhere,
but primed us for the current spec;
Anton Prowse,
whose relentless assault on CSS2.1 Chapter 9 forced some order out of the chaos;
and Oriol Brufau,
who teased apart dozens of fine distinctions and errors in this spec.
Honorable mentions also go to David Baron, Mats Palmgren, Ilya Streltsyn,
and Boris Zbarsky for their feedback.
Changes
Changes since the 11 July 2019 Candidate Recommendation
include:
-
Merged in additional prose from [[!CSS2]] into the definition of [=containing block=].
-
Clarified that, for the purpose of CSS, DOM nodes other than elements and text are ignored.
(Some source documents start from more complex trees,
such as the DOM,
which can have comment nodes
and other types of things.
For the purposes of CSS,
all of these additional types of nodes are ignored,
as if they didn't exist.)
-
Improved/moved glossary definitions relating to [=absolute positioning=].
Changes since the 28 August 2018 Candidate Recommendation
include:
-
Defined box tree parentage; see parent box.
-
Added definition of absolutely positioned to the glossary;
copied from CSS2 for easier referencing.
-
Added cross-references to various forms of fragmentation in [[#intro]].
-
Renamed “table box” to “table grid box” to more easily distinguish from “table wrapper box”.
-
Added “unless otherwise specified” to root → initial containing block propagation,
since there are some regrettable special exceptions for the HTML <{body}> element.
Changes Prior to Candidate Recommendation Status
A Disposition of Comments is available.
Changes since the 20 April 2018 Working Draft include:
Changes since the 20 July 2017 Working Draft include:
* Tightened up rules for the blockification of ''display/inline-block'' / ''inline flow-root''
to ensure compatibility with CSS2.
(Issue 1246)
Updated handling of ''run-in flow-root'' to match.
(Issue 1715)
* Adjusted grammar of 'display' to list the ''display/list-item'' keyword last. This affects the expected serialization order.
(Issue 1621)
* Added better definition of interaction between block formatting contexts and inline formatting contexts in block containers that establish inline formatting contexts.
(Issue 1553)
* More clearly defined the way property values are reflected
between an element and its boxes (in the case of an element generating multiple boxes).
(Issue 1643)
* Clarified that empty text objects are ignored for CSS rendering.
(Issue 1808)
* Clarified that 'display' has no effect on document semantics, since this is a common bug in UAs.
(Issue 2355)
* Fixed error in definition of 'display'’s computed value
(which is definitely not “as specified”, due to blockification and inlinification rules triggered by various properties).
(Issue 1716)
* Added definition for document order.
* Added missing SVG elements to Appendix B’s details on ''display: contents''
(Issue 2118),
clarified effect of SVG attributes
(Issue 2502),
and defined behavior for MathML
(Issue 2167).
* Added some guidance to future spec authors of anonymous box construction rules.
(Issue 1643)
* Pushed the section about “becoming a formatting context” back to CSS Containment where it is used.
* Various minor wording fixes and clarifications.
Changes since the 26 January 2017 Working Draft include:
* Remove inline-list-item value that is equivalent to ''inline list-item''.
* Added the notion of “text nodes” to the element tree,
and “text runs” to the box tree
to define behavior in the context of ''display: contents''.
(Issue 19,
Issue 32)
* Defined that the root element is “in flow”.
(Issue 3)
* Defined interaction of ''::first-line''/''::first-letter'' and ''run-in''.
(Issue 5,
Issue 42)
* Clarified that block/inline/run-in only dictates behavior in flow layout; it is ignored in other contexts.
* Run-ins are a type of inline box, not just "like" an inline box.
* Fixed the lack of recursion in of run-in's box-tree munging.
(Issue 45)
* Added an appendix on how ''display: contents'' works on “unusual elements”.
(Issue 8,
Issue 18)
* Fix blockification and inlinification rules,
particularly handling of layout-internal types.
(Issue 35,
Issue 57)
* Clarified interaction of various box tree fixups.
(Issue 38,
Issue 48)
* Added the definition of “becoming a formatting context”.
* Miscellaneous minor fixes and minor clarifications.
A Disposition of Comments is also available.
Changes since the 15 October 2015 Working Draft include:
- Deferred the box-suppress/display-or-not property to the next level of Display,
in order to provide time for further discussion of use cases.
- Specified the effects of ''display: contents'' on unusual elements such as replaced elements and form controls.
- Clarified that an element’s ''::before'' and ''::after'' pseudo-elements still exist if its own box is not generated due to ''display: contents''.
- Clarified that event bubbling is not affected by ''display: contents''.
- Clarified interaction of run-ins with out-of-flow elements and ''::first-letter''.
- Switched ''table-caption'' and ''table-cell'' to use ''flow-root'' as their inner display type, since they always form a formatting context root.
- Closed off remaining issues and added at-risk list.
Changes since the 21 July 2015 Working Draft include:
Changes since the 11 September 2014 Working Draft include:
- Removed display-inside, display-outside, and display-extras longhands,
in favor of just making 'display' multi-value.
(This was done to impose constraints on what can be combined.
Future levels of this specification may relax some or all of those restrictions
if they become unnecessary or unwanted.)
- Created the ''flow'' and ''flow-root'' inner display types
to better express flow layout display types
and to create an explicit switch for making an element a BFC root.
(This should eliminate the need for hacks
like ''::after { clear: both; }'' and ''overflow: hidden''
that are intended to accomplish this purpose.)
Privacy and Security Considerations
This specification introduces no new privacy or security considerations.