Update attr.xml

[AurelioDeRosa]

Removed incorrect sentence (possibly something that was valid in older versions of jQuery?) as proved here: http://jsfiddle.net/73cKp/1/

[AurelioDeRosa]

On a side note, I'm not sure of the correctness of this quote:

Note: Attempting to change the type attribute (or property) of an input element created via HTML or already in an HTML document will result in an error being thrown by Internet Explorer 6, 7, or 8.

I ran the same code on Internet Explorer 6-7, although using the F12 Developer Tools, and the attribute was changed.

[dmethvin]

A fresh document.createElement("input") lets you set the attribute once in old IE since it's initially undefined. Any further attempts (i.e., changing the type attribute once set) throw an exception.

[AurelioDeRosa]

Thank you for the heads up @dmethvin. I've been able to reproduce the issue with your hint, so the second note is valid. Any thought about the PR?

[dmethvin]

Yeah, this does need rewriting since we took off the prohibition in jQuery 1.9. How about this?

Note: Attempting to change the type attribute on an input or button element will throw an exception on Internet Explorer 8 or older.

[AurelioDeRosa]

LGTM. I also want to highlight that a similar note is present when discussing the method as a getter, which seems out of place to me. Should we remove the note in the getter section and update my PR to use your text?

[dmethvin]

Yeah, the getter note doesn't belong there I think.

[AurelioDeRosa]

Hi @dmethvin. I've updated the PR based on our discussion.

[AurelioDeRosa]

Any news on this PR?

[gnarf]

Hey @AurelioDeRosa - going through some old pulls this week and ran into this one:

Hi @dmethvin. I've updated the PR based on our discussion.

I don't see an update, this pull still shows removing the line entirely. Would you double check that you did actually update it? I'd be happy to merge this in!

[AurelioDeRosa]

Hi @gnarf. I've updated the PR based on the discussion. I don't why it wasn't already changed, but I guess I posted the message in the wrong thread.

[arthurvr]

Thanks, @AurelioDeRosa! Does this PR look good now, @gnarf @dmethvin?

[AurelioDeRosa]

@arthurvr No objections in a month, I think you can merge this PR.