Skip to content

Explain which key is META on common platforms #735

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Explain which key is META on common platforms #735

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cvrebert
Copy link
Contributor

@cvrebert cvrebert commented May 7, 2015

Since almost nobody has an actual old-school Meta (◆) key on their keyboard these days, let's save everyone the cross-referencing trip and explain what metaKey refers to in practice in the modern day.

Sources:

@cvrebert
Copy link
Contributor Author

cvrebert commented May 7, 2015

As per usual, the CLA bot is wrong.

@agcolom
Copy link
Member

agcolom commented May 7, 2015

@cvrebert Thanks for the PR. I can confirm that you have signed the CLA with matching name and email.

@scottgonzalez
Copy link
Member

I updated your first CLA signature to use the name that you have in your git config.

@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
<longdesc>
<p>Returns a boolean value (<code>true</code> or <code>false</code>) that indicates whether or not the <kbd>META</kbd> key was pressed at the time the event fired.
This key might map to an alternative key name on some platforms.</p>
<p>On Macintosh keyboards, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_key">Command key (⌘)</a> maps to the META key.</p>
<p>On Windows keyboards, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_key">Windows key</a> maps to the META key.</p>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few lines above this we wrapped META in <kbd> tags. I guess we should do that here too.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@arthurvr Done.

@arthurvr arthurvr closed this in 699e63f May 11, 2015
@cvrebert cvrebert deleted the patch-1 branch May 11, 2015 05:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants