Datepicker: added an option to enforce 6 calendar rows. Fixed #7210 - Add#171
Closed
ThiefMaster wants to merge 1 commit intojquery:masterfrom
Closed
Datepicker: added an option to enforce 6 calendar rows. Fixed #7210 - Add#171ThiefMaster wants to merge 1 commit intojquery:masterfrom
ThiefMaster wants to merge 1 commit intojquery:masterfrom
Conversation
… Add option to enforce 6-rows-calendar in datepicker
Member
|
Thanks for your patch, but we're not accepting new features for datepicker right now. This plugin is in the process of being rewritten. |
Author
|
Then take it as a suggestion for the new version ;) |
Member
|
Yup, the ticket is still open so it won't be lost :-) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This would allow two inline calendars on the same line to look good even with different months being displayed. See http://stackoverflow.com/q/5470805/298479 for an example of the behaviour which could be circumvented by this enhancement.