JS101 Improvements

[connor]

From a high-level, this is good since code can (sometimes) communicate quicker and more directly than words explaining that code. However, it feels like a lot of the sections in JavaScript101 could use some supporting text (and page structure - to make it more palatable, like <h3>'s, paragraph breaks, etc...). The ones in particular are:

• testing type
• scope
• the this keyword

---

What are people's thoughts on stuff like this? Should we use more text to explain it? I think so, but would love some other opinions (esp those on the jQuery team).

If you all agree, I'd be happy to rock out first versions of revisions.

[ajpiano]

Amen brother. Please rock out to your heart's content and I'll be happy to look at anything you come up with.

@ajpiano @connor - I'd like to help draft some supporting text for these pages.

[johnkpaul]

I just added a note to #70 saying that testing type should be merged with type. @pkane you can start working on this content directly in the markdown files.

[rwaldron]

I volunteer to review for this... let it rip.

[ajpiano]

@adrocknaphobia has also been doing some work in this area, and @rwldrn we'll definitely be happy to have your help to once we've got this freshened up

[rwaldron]

You know where to ping me ;)

Made some updates to 2/3 pages.

Find my Pull Request here:

#153

[arthurvr]

@ghost @connor One of you interested in picking this up again?