Basic Plugin Creation: remove confusing sentence

[arthurvr]

This sentence was confusing (#396) and didn't make sense. Replaced with a better example.

Update: As discussed, totally removed it.

[arthurvr]

Just for ref: this would fix #509 and #528 too... Seems like two issues were open.

[agcolom]

@scottgonzalez @jzaefferer Could you please take a look and see whether you're happy with the change. Thanks.

[scottgonzalez]

Honestly, utility methods have no place in this article. I'd say all references to them should be removed.

[arthurvr]

Honestly, utility methods have no place in this article. I'd say all references to them should be removed.

Nah... Makes sense you understand the difference when creating a plugin. I mean... you must know where to put your methods.

In this article there's nothing more than just this 3 sentences explaining the difference.

[scottgonzalez]

What percentage of developers do you think should be creating utility method plugins? I'd say it's near 0%.

[arthurvr]

What percentage of developers do you think should be creating utility method plugins? I'd say it's near 0%.

You think so? I don't agree, but I'll update my PR this evening.

[scottgonzalez]

So, what percentage? What are the use cases?

[arthurvr]

Other suggestion: move the utility method related stuff to 'advanced plugin concepts'.

[arschmitz]

I would agree with @scottgonzalez here. Many if not most utility methods that currently exist are only on the $ as a namespace if people are creating utilities they should not be on the $ namespace they should use their own namespace.

[arthurvr]

@agcolom @arschmitz @scottgonzalez Updated the pr.

[scottgonzalez]

There are still references, including a heading.

[arthurvr]

@scottgonzalez Indeed. Updated.

[scottgonzalez]

There's still this reference:

Note that the notion of chaining is not applicable to jQuery utility methods like $.trim().

Since we're in the plugin creation section, not the intro to jQuery section, I don't think this is relevant.

[scottgonzalez]

There are also still utility methods being generated in code examples.

[arthurvr]

@scottgonzalez Updated once again. Sorry man!

[arthurvr]

@scottgonzalez @agcolom @arschmitz Friendly ping for somebody to merge some stuff here and there. 50 open PRs isn't really encouraging for new contributors to join... 😒 (sorry if I'm I'm asking to the wrong people, I don't really know who to ask)

[arthurvr]

Thanks, @agcolom! #509 can be closed now too.