Skip to content

Update types.md #619

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Update types.md #619

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

xfq
Copy link
Contributor

@xfq xfq commented Jan 18, 2015

Update the URI of standard built-in objects in JavaScript.

xfq added 2 commits January 18, 2015 15:53
Update the URI of standard built-in objects in JavaScript.
Add title for the URI of standard built-in objects in MDN.
@xfq
Copy link
Contributor Author

xfq commented Jan 18, 2015

Done, thanks.

@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ var bar2;

## Objects

Everything else in JavaScript is considered an object. While there are [numerous built-in objects](https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript/Reference#Global_Objects, "MDN - Global Object Reference"), this chapter will cover:
Everything else in JavaScript is considered an object. While there are [numerous built-in objects](https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects "MDN - Standard built-in objects"), this chapter will cover:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"MDN - Global Object Reference" seems better than "MDN - Standard built-in objects" to me. (that's what was in originally)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm aware of that, but the title of the new page is "Standard built-in objects". If you think the old title/link is better, then I should also change the link to the right version of the old one (the old link without the extra comma and with language redirection) for consistency. WDYT?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed. It's okay as the PR is now. If no people disagree I'll merge it in this evening.

@arthurvr arthurvr closed this in fe3ee95 Jan 18, 2015
Krinkle pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants