Skip to content

Update avoid-conflicts-other-libraries.md #627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update avoid-conflicts-other-libraries.md #627

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

amalinich
Copy link

Wording seems ambiguous, this more directly states the end reality.

Wording seems ambiguous, this more directly states the end reality.
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ jQuery.noConflict();
</script>
```

Note that if you use this technique, you will not be able to use prototype.js methods inside the immediately invoked function that expect `$` to be prototype.js's `$`.
Note that if you use this technique, you will not be able to use prototype.js methods inside the immediately invoked function. `$` will be a reference to jQuery, not prototype.js.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

$ will be a reference to jQuery, not prototype.js.

Should the extension be there? I would opt to not have it in.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you are referring to 'prototype.js', I would rather leave it that way so as to avoid confusing the library with the concept of prototype.

@arthurvr
Copy link
Member

arthurvr commented Feb 7, 2015

@amalinich Looks like you haven't signed our CLA yet. Could you do so?

@amalinich
Copy link
Author

@arthurvr done

@gnarf
Copy link
Member

gnarf commented Feb 13, 2015

Can you ensure that the git author information matches the name and email you signed with?

@amalinich
Copy link
Author

This should be done, I was using a different github email than I thought.

@arthurvr
Copy link
Member

To me the CLA look good right now. Thanks @amalinich

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants