'g:tex_comment_nospell' option vs vimtex-grammar

[g6ai]

Observed Behaviour
g:tex_comment_nospell option was removed in #1834 , as discussed in #1799 (comment).

I like the new feature as described in the doc, vimtex-grammar section. I have tried textidote and vlty, they can skip comment spell checking, but I only managed to show the spell check result in the quickfix window rather than Vim's native in-line display (e.g. curly underline in gVim).

Expected Behaviour
Being able to to ignore comment in Vim's native spell checking, i.e. reenable g:tex_comment_nospell option; or is there a way to use compilers textidote or vlty in a manner of output-to-html, so we could see the grammar/spell check inline?

[lervag]

Thanks. I've added an option g:vimtex_syntax_nospell_comments - if you set it to 1 it will disable spell checking in comments.

Regarding textidote and vlty: these are not linked to the internal spell checker in Vim (e.g. curly underlines). They operate as external tools that rely on the quickfix or location lists to show the list of errors.

is there a way to use compilers textidote or vlty in a manner of output-to-html, so we could see the grammar/spell check inline?

I don't understand what this means. What do you mean by output-to-html?

[g6ai]

Thanks, that helps a lot! By saying output-to-html, I mean function like https://github.com/sylvainhalle/textidote#html-report and https://github.com/matze-dd/YaLafi#example-application. On second thought, I think these function can be defined in .vimrc by writing a Vim script.

[lervag]

Ah, I see. I also think you should add this type of functionality in your .vimrc. :)