Add more engine names as options to latexmk#2705
Add more engine names as options to latexmk#2705lervag merged 1 commit intolervag:masterfrom ehudbehar:master
Conversation
|
Thanks! |
|
Sorry, I realize I made an error here. The documentation we changed did not list an example; instead, it displays the default value of the option. We should either 1) revert this change, or 2) add the added lines to the default value as well. What do you think? |
|
Just noticed this issue. I think adding to the default value is a fine option. Unrelated remark, I think that latexmk does not "officially" support running anything other than LaTeX so "telling" latexmk that "to call the pdflatex compiler call pdftex instead" is a workaround. That having said, there may be some performance benefit to "fake" xetex for xelatex instead of for pdflatex: https://stackoverflow.com/a/57734531/5267751 -- testing is needed. Note that this will be a compatibility break because currently Another issue is, many features of vimtex is "hard coded" for LaTeX, so for example after the change is made you may have the following With |
|
Thanks for the interesting remarks, @user202729. I think I want to revert the change instead of adding to the default list. My main point is that the option already allows to change these things for those who want/need them. This group of people is clearly small (as I have never had any similar requests before this one). |
Continuing issue #2683, I added 3 more lines to the documentation that describe how to compile a plain tex document with either
pdftex,xetexorluatex.