Modify the library load information being used in the example

[ninezero90hy]

In the example, there is a renamed file in the library you are using
I think it's because you didn't lock the package
I'm sure you had a reason why you didn't lock the package, so I quickly fixed the problem

@mistic100 What do you think? 😉

Merge request checklist

• I read the guidelines for contributing
• I created my branch from dev and I am issuing the PR to dev
• I didn't pushed the dist directory
• Unit tests are OK
• If it's a new feature, I added the necessary unit tests
• If it's a new language, I filled the __locale and __author fields

[ninezero90hy]

I didn't modify the function!
I don't think my change caused me to fail the unit test. :)
The test is also failing in the master branch 🤔
No? @mistic100 Is it my problem?

[mistic100]

@ninezero90hy tests are failing for months and I never found why (it works on a local computer).

Could you update the version to "^1.0.0" in both the package.json and bower.json (though someday this file will be removed) ?

[ninezero90hy]

I didn't understand exactly, but do you mean to change the library version I changed to ^1.0.0?

[ninezero90hy]

  "dependencies": {
    ...
    "jquery-extendext": "0.1.2",
    ...
  }

I think locking the package is a fundamental solution.
I think that if you don't lock the package, another problem may arise later by another library.
If you don't want to fix the example, I think it's a good idea to fix the jquery-extendext version to 0.1.2.

@mistic100 What do you think?
This is what I think.

I think a lot of people would like to see the samples.

[ninezero90hy]

Oh! And I'm just wondering, is there a reason why you don't lock the package?
It's just a question 😉

[mistic100]

I think locking the package prevents to get fixes, moreover because QueryBuilder is not released often, and extendext is mine.
The error was to define ">=" but "^" is totally fine.

No it should not be locked to 0.1.2 because this is an outdated version.

---

Version locking is done my the end-users not the librairies, unless there is a strong know incompatibility.

[ninezero90hy]

Okay! So you're saying the modified sample is correct?