Skip to content

Conversation

@ajoslin
Copy link
Contributor

@ajoslin ajoslin commented Mar 20, 2016

Using a write stream, the target file is erased when css-extract starts.

This means that when using livereload with CSS, there are two visible
reloads: once at the start of css-extract with a blank css file, and once
when it finishes with the expected result.

Using writeFileSync, the file is only edited once in place.

Using a write stream, the target file would be erased each time
css-extract started.

This meant that, when using livereload with CSS, there were two visible
reloads: once at the start of css-extract, and once when it finished.

Using writeFileSync, the file is only edited once in place.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 100.00%

Merging #1 into master will not affect coverage as of 99c6b39

@@            master      #1   diff @@
======================================
  Files            1       1       
  Stmts           35      38     +3
  Branches         0       0       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
+ Hit             35      38     +3
  Partial          0       0       
  Missed           0       0       

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 99c6b39

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@yoshuawuyts
Copy link
Contributor

This sounds quite reasonable to me. @hughsk what's your take on this?

@hughsk
Copy link
Member

hughsk commented Mar 24, 2016

@yoshuawuyts I reckon let's merge for now to avoid bugs and look into supporting non-inline syntax when we can :)

@hughsk
Copy link
Member

hughsk commented Mar 24, 2016

Oops, wrong issue! This looks good all the same :D

@yoshuawuyts
Copy link
Contributor

💯 excellent! I'll resolve the merge conflicts and merge

@yoshuawuyts
Copy link
Contributor

Published as v1.0.4. Thanks for the patch! ✨

@ajoslin ajoslin deleted the write-file branch March 25, 2016 15:00
@ajoslin
Copy link
Contributor Author

ajoslin commented Mar 25, 2016

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants