Skip to content

Update @parcel/watcher-darwin-x64 2.5.1 → 2.5.4 (patch)#19576

Closed
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
depfu/update/pnpm/@parcel/watcher-darwin-x64-2.5.4
Closed

Update @parcel/watcher-darwin-x64 2.5.1 → 2.5.4 (patch)#19576
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
depfu/update/pnpm/@parcel/watcher-darwin-x64-2.5.4

Conversation

@depfu
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Jan 18, 2026

Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ @​parcel/watcher-darwin-x64 (2.5.1 → 2.5.4) · Repo

Release Notes

2.5.4

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v2.5.1...v2.5.4

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 20 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 18, 2026 19:40
@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Jan 18, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 18, 2026

Walkthrough

A devDependency version for @parcel/watcher-darwin-x64 was updated from ^2.5.1 to ^2.5.4 in the packages/@tailwindcss-standalone/package.json file. This is a patch-level version bump with no changes to logic, error handling, or control flow.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: updating a specific dependency from version 2.5.1 to 2.5.4, including the patch designation.
Description check ✅ Passed The description directly relates to the changeset by providing detailed release notes, changelog information, and commit history for the @parcel/watcher-darwin-x64 package update.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@depfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

depfu bot commented Jan 18, 2026

Sorry, but the merge failed with:

At least 1 approving review is required by reviewers with write access.

@RobinMalfait RobinMalfait mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2026
@depfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

depfu bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Closed in favor of #19619.

@depfu depfu bot closed this Jan 30, 2026
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/pnpm/@parcel/watcher-darwin-x64-2.5.4 branch January 30, 2026 07:37
RobinMalfait added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2026
This PR bumps a bunch of dependencies. This also moves a few
dependencies that we use in multiple packages to the pnpm catalog.

Closes: #19603, #19604, #19576, #19575, #19573, #19565, #19547, #19546,
#19545, #19609, #19581, #19620, #19619

- #19603
- #19604
- #19576
- #19575
- #19573
- #19565
- #19547
- #19546
- #19545
- #19609
- #19581
- #19620 
- #19620
- #19619

## Test Plan

All tests in CI should still pass. [ci-all]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants