Fix decoration utility ambiguity
#6217
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR makes
decoration-[3px]work automatically.The main reason for the
anytype is so that we don't have to parse thevalue and can assume that this plugin handles "any" value you give it.
This is useful because
decoration-[var(--something)]would becorrectly translated to the correct decoration property. However, we
introduce another plugin with the same
decorationprefix.This means that now both
textDecorationColorandtextDecorationThicknesshave the same base utility name:decoration.textDecorationColorhad ['color', 'any']textDecorationThicknesshad ['length', 'percentage']This means that
3pxfit both in thelengthdata type of thetextDecorationThicknessplugin and in theanydata type of thetextDecorationColorplugin.Removing the
anyfixes this.TL;DR: Only have
anywhen there are no conflicting utility names.