-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 791
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathissues-cr-2016.bsi
More file actions
56 lines (55 loc) · 2.14 KB
/
issues-cr-2016.bsi
File metadata and controls
56 lines (55 loc) · 2.14 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-break-3-20160114/
Title: CSS Fragmentation Module Level 3
----
Issue 1.
Summary: Clarify application of widows and orphans
From: Florian Rivoal
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1823
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1823#issuecomment-335868256
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0025.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary: Clarify break propagation
From: claytron5000
Comment: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/7958#issuecomment-384413748
Response: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/7958#issuecomment-385836225
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2614
Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/fa5bc2b61b56
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0029.html
----
Issue 3.
Summary: Fix applies-to lines for break-*
From: Mats Palmgren
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1904
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1904#issuecomment-414395314
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/23d5a4c7b28f9767f7f7a621a7b895d4b858bbca
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0023.html
----
Issue 4.
Summary: Clarify how inline-block may be not monolithic
From: Koji Ishii
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1111
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1111
Open: Accepted, awaiting confirmation
Resolved: Editorial
Verified:
----
Issue 5.
Summary: Ruby containers are not monolithic
From: Oriol Brufau
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1474
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1474#issuecomment-414397077
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 6.
Summary: Define empty fragment at fragmentainer boundary to stay on previous
From: Morten Stenshorne
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1529
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1529#issuecomment-415592931
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0023.html
----