[mediaqueries-3] Republish REC

[frivoal]

Mediaqueries 3 has one proposed correction, which successfully completed its Last Call for Review of Proposed Amendments. We can therefore fold it in normatively and republish the REC.

It also has one candidate correction. Tests pass, but we haven't issued a Last Call for Review of Proposed Amendments on it yet. We should.

Agenda+ to propose:
(1) folding in correction 1
(2) upgrading correction 2 from candidate to proposed
(3) republishing

[frivoal]

More details about Proposed Correction 1, courtesy of @svgeesus

MQ3 is a W3C Recommendation, published 05 April 2022 with one proposed correction
https://www.w3.org/TR/mediaqueries-3/#changes-2012

An AC review was held 2022-04-05 to 2022-06-06 with 6 in support, one not supporting, and one abstention. No formal objections.
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/mediaqueries-3-proposedcorrections-2022/results

The not supporting response gave the following rationale:

It is left as an exercise for the reviewer to determine how the tests provided cover the questions asked.

Apparently the Working Group couldn't manage to run the set of tests they have in Firefox, meaning the test results didn't provide sufficient information to show the criteria they set were satisfied.

There are still tests that do not seem to be passed by any browser, and tests for which it is possible that the reason for passing is not a correct implementation.

This work doesn't seem to reach the level of quality necessary. Being a small amount of work, it's probably close, but there is insufficient explanation and too much left to the reader to confidently provide support.

I answered this on 7 April 2022, copying w3c-archive
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2022Apr/0117.html

In response, Chaals withdrew his informal objection
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2022Apr/0118.html

and I clarified the Implementation Experience part of the WBS for the benefit of other AC reps.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2022Apr/0127.html

So we are all sorted from the AC review and Implementation Report points of view.
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/mediaqueries?label=experimental&label=master&aligned&q=mq-invalid-media-type

[svgeesus]

@astearns I feel this could easily be an async decision?

It also has one candidate correction.

Not, on /TR, but it is in the ED

@frivoal so that ED is all ready to go, once we have a WG resolution?

[astearns]

The CSSWG will automatically accept these resolutions one week from now if no objections are raised here. Anyone can add an emoji to this comment to express support. If you do not support these resolution, please add a new comment.

Proposed Resolution: Edit in Proposed correction 1 to Media Queries level 3
Proposed Resolution: Upgrade Candidate correction 2 to Proposed Correction
Proposed Resolution: Republish Media Queries level 3 with those two edits

[astearns]

RESOLVED: Edit in Proposed correction 1 to Media Queries level 3
RESOLVED: Upgrade Candidate correction 2 to Proposed Correction
RESOLVED: Republish Media Queries level 3 with those two edits