Per spec, the result of progress(1 from 1 to 1) is NaN, which might be censored to 0 at the top-level of a calculation tree (#10979).
This case is very unlikely, but I wonder if it should not also resolve to 0 when it is used in another calculation, rather than infecting it with NaN.
Per spec, the result of
progress(1 from 1 to 1)isNaN, which might be censored to0at the top-level of a calculation tree (#10979).This case is very unlikely, but I wonder if it should not also resolve to
0when it is used in another calculation, rather than infecting it with NaN.