In the two levels, the word-wrap property is defined together with overflow-wrap in the same definition table. That defines the property as a real one, different from overflow-wrap.
But the table is followed by text that defines word-wrap as a legacy name alias of the overflow-wrap property.
I suspect the property should only be defined as a legacy name alias (consistent with how such legacy properties are defined in css-align-3, css-fonts-4 and css-ui-4).
In the two levels, the
word-wrapproperty is defined together withoverflow-wrapin the same definition table. That defines the property as a real one, different fromoverflow-wrap.But the table is followed by text that defines
word-wrapas a legacy name alias of theoverflow-wrapproperty.I suspect the property should only be defined as a legacy name alias (consistent with how such legacy properties are defined in css-align-3, css-fonts-4 and css-ui-4).