Skip to content

[mediaqueries] Add CanIUse panels #1224

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
cvrebert opened this issue Apr 15, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

[mediaqueries] Add CanIUse panels #1224

cvrebert opened this issue Apr 15, 2017 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@cvrebert
Copy link
Member

Bikeshed has a feature to include CanIUse info panels in specs. (Example; Example commit)

I wonder if Media Queries would consider using this feature? Here are the spec anchors and corresponding CanIUse features for Media Queries:

CSS spec URL(s) CanIUse feature URL
https://drafts.csswg.org/mediaqueries-3/#resolution
https://drafts.csswg.org/mediaqueries/#resolution
http://caniuse.com/#feat=css-media-resolution
https://drafts.csswg.org/mediaqueries/#mf-interaction http://caniuse.com/#feat=css-media-interaction
https://drafts.csswg.org/mediaqueries/#scripting http://caniuse.com/#feat=css-media-scripting
@tabatkins tabatkins added the mediaqueries-4 Current Work label Apr 20, 2017
@frivoal frivoal self-assigned this May 8, 2017
@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented May 8, 2017

@astearns @atanassov As this is a WG wide editorial issue that we haven't quite resolved on yet, I'd like to move it to mediaqueries-5, so as not to block progress to CR on the MQ4 spec.

We can still do it for MQ4 as well when the whole WG decides to do it, but I don't think this is useful to hold this against MQ4 as an open issue to be resolved.

OK?

@cvrebert
Copy link
Member Author

cvrebert commented May 8, 2017

@frivoal Did #1219 (comment) not resolve it sufficiently?

@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented May 8, 2017

@cvrebert It kind of does. However, bikeshed will generate the caniuse tables regardless of the status of the document, and taking this in an out all the time depending on whether I am publishing an ED or a draft for TR is error prone.

I've just filed an issue for that on bikeshed: speced/bikeshed#1010

In the meanwhile, I'll add the metadata in the spec, but turned off until either @tabatkins adds the feature to bikeshed or the rest of the WG tells me to stop whining and do it anyway :)

@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented May 8, 2017

Closing this, as I've set the draft to start generating the tables as soon as speced/bikeshed#1012 is merged in bikeshed.

@frivoal frivoal added the Testing Unnecessary Memory aid - issue doesn't require tests label Jul 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants