-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 715
[css-position-3] Typos/Issues in the Sticky Positioning section #2152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
For me the main problem is: The sticky will not work with |
@Nadya678 That comment doesn't seem to address anything in my bug report. Are you sure you posted it in the right one? |
Yes. I want not to duplicate the bug isseus. "Issues in the Sticky Positioning section" Quote:
in my opinion this sentence should be removed and the behaviour for all elements (and display values) should be the same. |
Hi @Nadya678, I appreciate you not wanting to post a duplicate issue, but your issue is really quite different from the one @Tyler-H has posted here -- his is about a handful of wording fixes, yours is about a particular functionality that's problematic. Please do file a separate issue; that the title of this one is vague enough to accommodate almost anything isn't a reason to pile all the issues with 'sticky' into this one issue. :) |
@Tyler-H OK, we've rewrote most of this section and also fixed the typo that remained. :) Thanks~ |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
In Sticky Positioning, I've noticed quite a few grammatical errors/incomprehensible passages. Each one is contained in a quote block, followed by my remarks and/or replacement suggestions.
(redundant phrase outlined in bold).
I recommend reordering the following sentence:
To:
(The bit in brackets is optional; I think the passage works well, if not better, without it).
Also, the term "flow box" is very esoteric, and never explicitly defined. It took me something like 15 minutes to intuit that it is just the containing block. Could we just replace instances of 'flow box' here with 'containing block'?
This would also facilitate the improved readability of the following paragraph:
By rewriting it as:
...which I think reads much better.
(extra e in containment)
(The actual spelling is upward. Upwards is a variant that's taken hold due to some folks' tendency to add an 's' to directional words like "upward, forward, backward, onward, toward". Unfortunately I didn't catch this error in time for animation-fill-mode properties, but luckily this is just prose, not a keyword)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: