You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We had listed 'outline' as supported on ::selection, so I tried my best to add a reasonable definition of what that would mean:
The outline, if supported, must be drawn around the union of the active portions of the highlight overlay precisely along the boundaries of those portions and not between congruent parts. The UA may use the outline styling of the nearest common ancestor of any continuous or discontinuous range rather than piecing together varying styles of outline into a single shape.
It seems a bit crazy, so I'm wondering if it should be dropped from the list of supported styles or any implementer thinks it's worth keeping.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The CSS Working Group just discussed outline on ::selection, and agreed to the following:
RESOLVED: Remove outline from list of supported styles on ::selection
The full IRC log of that discussion
<dael> Topic: outline on ::selection
<dael> github: https://github.com//issues/3604
<jensimmons> Thanks for letting me announce that! Thanks astearns !
<dael> fantasai: currently outline applies. I tried to add a definition but it's not that simple and I don't think anyone impl. Does anyone want this? If not we can drop it. It's able selection as well as spell check.
<dael> dbaron: I wouldn't know how to define it so happy to remove
<fantasai> s/able/about/
<dael> florian: use cases I'm aware of don't call or it so I'm okay
<dael> astearns: Anyone want to keep it?
<fremy> +1 drop it
<dael> astearns: Prop: Remove outline from list of supported styles on ::selection
<dael> astearns: Obj?
<florian> s/I'm aware of/I care about/
<dael> RESOLVED: Remove outline from list of supported styles on ::selection
We had listed 'outline' as supported on ::selection, so I tried my best to add a reasonable definition of what that would mean:
It seems a bit crazy, so I'm wondering if it should be dropped from the list of supported styles or any implementer thinks it's worth keeping.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: