You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Find the item-incurred increase for each spanned track with an affected size
It's not clear whether "item-incurred increase" is a definition or a reference to some existing concept. I think the former, but it's not clear at first sight. I believe definitions should be in bold italic text, not just italic.
by distributing the space equally among them,
Does "them" refer to the spanned tracks or the affected size? I guess the latter. Also, it can seem this distribution is increasing the affected sizes, while in fact I understand that it goes to the item-incurred increase (and this is its definition).
freezing tracks as their size reaches their growth limit
It's not clear which size this is talking about. I guess it refers to the affected size plus the item-incurred increase.
Note: If the affected size was a growth limit, this step has no effect.
In that case I think the step is still defining "item-incurred increase", which is referenced by later steps. Isn't this an effect? The note could clarify that the "item-incurred increase" is then 0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's not clear whether "item-incurred increase" is a definition or a reference to some existing concept. I think the former, but it's not clear at first sight. I believe definitions should be in bold italic text, not just italic.
It's a variable, and thus marked up with <var>.
Does "them" refer to the spanned tracks or the affected size? I guess the latter.
Right.
It's not clear which size this is talking about. I guess it refers to the affected size plus the item-incurred increase.
From https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#extra-space, "Distribute space to base sizes up to growth limits":
It's not clear whether "item-incurred increase" is a definition or a reference to some existing concept. I think the former, but it's not clear at first sight. I believe definitions should be in bold italic text, not just italic.
Does "them" refer to the spanned tracks or the affected size? I guess the latter. Also, it can seem this distribution is increasing the affected sizes, while in fact I understand that it goes to the item-incurred increase (and this is its definition).
It's not clear which size this is talking about. I guess it refers to the affected size plus the item-incurred increase.
In that case I think the step is still defining "item-incurred increase", which is referenced by later steps. Isn't this an effect? The note could clarify that the "item-incurred increase" is then 0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: