[css-scroll-snap] Make it more obvious that scroll-padding/scroll-margin have effects outside snap containers

[fantasai]

This seems to be a common slip-up, which isn't surprising, since the spec was originally written to only apply to snap containers.

[jonjohnjohnson]

#2428

[fantasai]

Agenda+ to request republication.

[jonjohnjohnson]

@fantasai if you think the changes and upcoming discussion in this issue warrant closing #2428, please do so. I'll be glad it's at least covered here, even if slightly discouraged that something I thoughtfully filed flew under the radar.

[css-meeting-bot]

The CSS Working Group just discussed Scroll Snap republication, and agreed to the following:

• RESOLVED: Publish updated CR for Scroll Snap

The full IRC log of that discussion

<dael> Topic: Scroll Snap republication
<dael> github: https://github.com//issues/3721#issuecomment-471783264
<dael> fantasai: Made some spec clarification to make implications easier to notice. Clearly editorial, asking for repub
<dael> astearns: What about the issue from jonjonjohnson?
<dael> fantasai: That's filed against CSSOM View spec. If that needs clarification I didn't fix anything in there. I just fixed scrollsnap
<dael> fantasai: Updated CR
<dael> astearns: There is a change list and DoC?
<dael> fantasai: There was only one comment which was mine. DoC seemed excessive
<fantasai> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap-1/#changes
<dael> astearns: SHould have a changes list so when we repub people know it's one thing
<dael> fantasai: Here it is ^
<dael> astearns: Just editorial or any test changes?
<florian> I have reviewed the change and support it.
<dael> fantasai: No normative implications. Emphasizing points on stuff we agreed
<dael> astearns: Comments on updating?
<dael> astearns: I see florian supports
<dael> astearns: Objection to Publish updated CR for Scroll Snap?
<dael> RESOLVED: Publish updated CR for Scroll Snap