-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 708
[css-multicol] the minimum and preferred width of a multicol is not defined anywhere #420
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Cc @frivoal, and because chrome is buggy also @tabatkins |
Regarding Chrome's behavior in the first jsfiddle: This is because Chrome respects orphans and widows, whose initial values are 2. See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=638530 |
Multi-col intrinsic sizes are defined in https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#multicol-intrinsic |
Yup, looks like this is well-defined now (and results in Firefox's behavior).
|
Alright, since we have a definition everybody seems to be happy about, I'm closing this. |
@FremyCompany Based on you being there during the conf call where we decided on this, I'm labeling you as "Commenter Satisfied". Let me know if that is a misunderstanding. |
@frivoal No misunderstanding, I'm satisfied with the resolution 💯 |
And, of course, that means it isn't interoperable ;-)
So even if it is defined somewhere implementers didn't find it...
I think Firefox makes sense when you need fit-content:
And it makes sense again when you need min-content:
I have seen real interop issues due to this while digging some tables bugs.
We should sort this out ;-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: