Skip to content

[css-will-change] Better wording for <animateable-feature> #4617

@mrego

Description

@mrego

The syntax for will-change property is the following one:

  Value: auto | <animateable-feature>#

However the definition of <animateable-feature> is quite broad, an excerpt:

it indicates that the author expects to animate or change the property

So a property like contain that is not animatable per spec is still considered part of these <animateable-feature> (see issue #4612).

I initially got confused about this, thinking that it shouldn't apply to contain because it was not animatable.
Could we find a better wording to avoid that kind of confusion? Or it was just me reading wrong the spec?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions