I18n self-review of CSS Color 4

[svgeesus]

Short i18n review checklist is here

1. If the spec (or its implementation) contains any natural language text that will be read by a human (this includes error messages or other UI text, JSON strings, etc, etc),

   No

2. If the spec (or its implementation) allows content authors to produce typographically appealing text, either in its own right, or in association with graphics.

   No

3. If the spec (or its implementation) allows the user to point into text, creates text fragments, concatenates text, allows the user to select or step through text (using a cursor or other methods), etc.

   No

4. If the spec (or its implementation) allows searching or matching of text, including syntax and identifiers

   No

5. If the spec (or its implementation) sorts text

   No

6. If the spec (or its implementation) captures user input

   No

7. If the spec (or its implementation) deals with time in any way that will be read by humans and/or crosses time zone boundaries

   No

8. If the spec (or its implementation) allows any character encoding other than UTF-8.

   No

9. If the spec (or its implementation) defines markup.

   No

10. If the spec (or its implementation) deals with names, addresses, time & date formats, etc

    No

11. If the spec (or its implementation) describes a format or data that is likely to need localization.

    No

12. If the spec (or its implementation) makes any reference to or relies on any cultural norms

    Yes, some color choices have associations which vary by culture.

[svgeesus]

@r12a ok to close this on our end?

w3c/i18n-request#116
w3c/i18n-activity#897

[svgeesus]

Completed