-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 709
[css-ruby-1] Size/position of annotation container for inter-character ruby #5994
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@upsuper Totally fine with making the change you request, it makes sense. But there's several ways to interpret it:
Which option do you think makes the most sense? (I'm personally leaning towards 2, since it at least relates to how the annotations are positioning somewhat, but it doesn't particularly matter.) |
I would prefer 1 (and I suppose you mean over base container not annotation container), as even for inter-character I think rb-rb-rt-rt style is still possible, and thus it would be good to still have the annotation container span across its bases somehow. Putting it at the end of the last base makes its behavior further diverge from others, which could become another nuisance impls need to handle for no good reason. As implementation may position ruby annotation relative to the container, it might be good to make it always immediately over the base container, rather than stack with other annotation levels. |
@upsuper OK. Detail: So normally an annotation container won't span the last inter-character annotation, since interlinear annotations center over the base ignoring its inter-character annotation(s). Should it be the same here, or should these span all their bases and their annotations? |
I will try to implement inter-character and see how it goes then feedback here. |
@upsuper wrote in https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0118.html :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: