Skip to content

[css-style-attr] Revise the REC? #6360

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
xfq opened this issue Jun 8, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

[css-style-attr] Revise the REC? #6360

xfq opened this issue Jun 8, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
css-style-attr-3

Comments

@xfq
Copy link
Member

xfq commented Jun 8, 2021

https://www.w3.org/TR/css-style-attr/

We have a substantive change and some editorial changes. Should we (convert it to Bikeshed and) revise the REC?
@xfq
Copy link
Member Author

xfq commented Jun 8, 2021

Related Process section: https://www.w3.org/2020/Process-20200915/#revised-rec-substantive

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor

svgeesus commented Jun 8, 2021

This is substantive but adds no new features so we can (under Process 2020) publish a new Rec with candidate corrections and a (minimum 60 day) review period.

We no longer have to go back to CR -> PR -> Rec.

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor

svgeesus commented Nov 3, 2022

@tantek @fantasai thoughts?

I suggest not converting it to bikeshed, just edit the generated html to add the correction.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
css-style-attr-3
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@svgeesus @xfq