Skip to content

[cssom] "For each CSS property property that is a suppor..." #6421

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
cscott opened this issue Jul 3, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #6424
Closed

[cssom] "For each CSS property property that is a suppor..." #6421

cscott opened this issue Jul 3, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #6424
Labels
cssom-1 Current Work

Comments

@cscott
Copy link

cscott commented Jul 3, 2021

https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/#example-a40690cb

For each CSS property property that is a supported CSS property, the following partial interface applies where camel-cased attribute is obtained by running the CSS property to IDL attribute algorithm for property.

It would be nice to have an html anchor for this text, for reference in implementation documentation.

@emilio
Copy link
Collaborator

emilio commented Jul 5, 2021

I think the right link should be: https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/#dom-cssstyledeclaration-camel-cased-attribute

Perhaps we can move the definition a bit further up.

emilio added a commit to emilio/csswg-drafts that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2021
Not sure if this is 100% worth it but it should close w3c#6421, and I think
it's better.
@emilio
Copy link
Collaborator

emilio commented Jul 5, 2021

Would #6424 address this for you? It'd make the above link go to the paragraph you quoted.

@xfq xfq added the cssom-1 Current Work label Jul 6, 2021
mfreed7 pushed a commit to mfreed7/csswg-drafts that referenced this issue Aug 4, 2021
Not sure if this is 100% worth it but it should close w3c#6421, and I think
it's better.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cssom-1 Current Work
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants