-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 757
Closed
Labels
CSS2Closed Accepted by CSSWG ResolutionCommenter SatisfiedCommenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.Commenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.css-overflow-3Current WorkCurrent Work
Description
Via language that was carried over from css2, overflow: hidden is specified in css-overflow as (emphasis mine):
This value indicates that the content is clipped and that no scrolling user interface should be provided by the UA to view the content outside the clipping region. However, the content may still be scrolled programatically, for example using the mechanisms defined in [CSSOM-VIEW].
I do not believe that this should is intentional, so we ought to replace it with must. overflow: hidden isn't meant to be scrollable except via script. Or is it?
I'm asking because iOS has a bug where it is scrollable in some corner cases. But if we have should rather than must, then maybe it is not a bug.
References:
jonjohnjohnson
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
CSS2Closed Accepted by CSSWG ResolutionCommenter SatisfiedCommenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.Commenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.css-overflow-3Current WorkCurrent Work