Skip to content

[snapshot-2017] Candidate modules for inclusion #826

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
svgeesus opened this issue Dec 21, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

[snapshot-2017] Candidate modules for inclusion #826

svgeesus opened this issue Dec 21, 2016 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
css-2017 The 2017 snapshot

Comments

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor

As requested by @dbaron on 2016-12-21 CSS call. All modules (CSS and fxtf) sorted by already-there, will-include, and the rest.

https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/master/snapshot-2017-modules.md

@svgeesus svgeesus added the css-2017 The 2017 snapshot label Dec 21, 2016
@dbaron
Copy link
Member

dbaron commented Dec 21, 2016

I made an edit to that list to fix one duplicate I caught.

Looking through the list of things that aren't included, I think things worth considering to add to the "fairly stable but beware" level (although I'd probably lean against inclusion on some of them) are:
css-align
css-grid
css-ruby
css-text
css-writing-modes
filters-1

We should also think about whether things like cssom, cssom-view, and the houdini specs should be part of a snapshot if they're stable enough.

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

We should also think about whether things like cssom, cssom-view, and the houdini specs should be part of a snapshot if they're stable enough.

I see no reason not to, if they are stable enough.

@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented Dec 22, 2016

@dbaron I agree on your list of fairly stable but beware specs (maybe not ruby), but how about also including css-break? implementation is somewhat spotty, but the spec itself seems to me to be in good shape, and quoting the introduction:

The primary audience is CSS implementers, not CSS authors, as this definition includes modules by specification stability, not Web browser adoption rate.

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

svgeesus commented Dec 26, 2016

Also, snapshot 2015 promises that indices of properties, functions etc are coming:
https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS/#indices

Snapshot 2017 should link to the specific sections:

2 Properties and Descriptors
3 Property/Descriptor Values
4 Functions
5 At-Rules
6 Selectors

because the indices are not well known at present.
https://drafts.csswg.org/indexes/

@dbaron
Copy link
Member

dbaron commented Jan 14, 2017

We just discussed in the WG meeting, and concluded:

Add to primary section:
Writing Modes

Add to rough interop section:
Variables
Text

Add to completed design section:
Align
Grid
Filters
Break

@frivoal frivoal self-assigned this Jan 14, 2017
@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented Jan 14, 2017

Closed by f1adcde

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
css-2017 The 2017 snapshot
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants