display already includes some new values defined in MathML Core:
The display property from CSS Display Module Level 3 is extended with a new inner display type:
Name: display
New values: <display-outside> || [ <display-inside> | math ]
https://w3c.github.io/mathml-core/#new-display-math-value
Name: display
Value: [ <display-outside> || <display-inside> ] | ...
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/#propdef-display
The New values field value is expected to be joined to the target value space using | as the glue:
[ <display-outside> || <display-inside> ] | ... | <display-outside> || [ <display-inside> | math ]
Would it be acceptable to include math in <display-inside>? The property definition table in MathML Core could then be marked with an informative class, which means w3c/webref would ignore it when scraping definitions from MathML Core.
displayalready includes some new values defined in MathML Core:https://w3c.github.io/mathml-core/#new-display-math-value
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/#propdef-display
The
New valuesfield value is expected to be joined to the target value space using|as the glue:Would it be acceptable to include
mathin<display-inside>? The property definition table in MathML Core could then be marked with aninformativeclass, which meansw3c/webrefwould ignore it when scraping definitions from MathML Core.