You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #3201 there were specific animation type rules added for grid-template-columns and grid-template-rows. In https://crbug.com/1365967@bramus raised a use case where it would be nice to interpolate grid-auto-columns and grid-auto-rows.
It doesn't look like any browser supports this today, based on my simple demo but I don't see why we shouldn't support interpolating the auto properties as well. Given the syntax is only <track-size>+ I think the animation type may need to be:
Animation type: if the list lengths match, by computed value type per item; discrete otherwise
Unless per item animation is already implied by the animation type of a list of track sizes?
It's already marked as animatable, and lists should default to animating in that fashion. But we went ahead and clarified this based on your comment. ^_^
In #3201 there were specific animation type rules added for
grid-template-columns
andgrid-template-rows
. In https://crbug.com/1365967 @bramus raised a use case where it would be nice to interpolategrid-auto-columns
andgrid-auto-rows
.It doesn't look like any browser supports this today, based on my simple demo but I don't see why we shouldn't support interpolating the auto properties as well. Given the syntax is only
<track-size>+
I think the animation type may need to be:Unless per item animation is already implied by the animation type of a list of track sizes?
@fantasai
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: