Skip to content

[css-viewport] Define the viewport property in window#10548

Merged
chrishtr merged 1 commit into
w3c:mainfrom
darktears:define-viewport-object
Jul 10, 2024
Merged

[css-viewport] Define the viewport property in window#10548
chrishtr merged 1 commit into
w3c:mainfrom
darktears:define-viewport-object

Conversation

@darktears
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@darktears darktears commented Jul 9, 2024

In preparation to add the segments property we need to make sure that the viewport property is properly specified. This patch already adds the zoom property to the viewport interface as it was already defined.

@darktears darktears requested review from chrishtr and emilio July 9, 2024 15:49
In preparation to add the segments property we need to
make sure that the viewport property is properly specified.
This patch already adds the zoom property to the viewport
interface as it was already defined.
@darktears darktears force-pushed the define-viewport-object branch from 9abeb26 to edd88b7 Compare July 9, 2024 15:51
@darktears darktears requested a review from bramus July 9, 2024 15:54
@darktears
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I wasn't entirely sure about the zoom property and where it's supposed to be defined so I can rework the patch if it's not supposed to be on the window.viewport object.

@chrishtr chrishtr merged commit e462f14 into w3c:main Jul 10, 2024
@bramus
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bramus commented Jul 12, 2024

I don’t think zoom is an attribute that needs to be defined on the Window object. What the css-viewport spec describes is the CSS zoom property.

@chrishtr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I don’t think zoom is an attribute that needs to be defined on the Window object. What the css-viewport spec describes is the CSS zoom property.

Oops, I didn't read this PR carefully enough. Indeed, it's not a property. I'll revert this PR.

@bramus
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bramus commented Jul 12, 2024

Rest of the PR looks good, though.

@darktears
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I could have just reverted the IDL.

@chrishtr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think it'd be better to just redo the PR. I'll review it promptly.

@darktears
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@chrishtr see #10564

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants