Skip to content

Conversation

@emilio
Copy link
Collaborator

@emilio emilio commented Aug 22, 2024

The WebIDL namespace is global, it's a bit better if we call this something a bit more view-transitions-specific so that other specs don't rely on it, since UpdateCallback is otherwise very generic.

I don't think this would be a normative change since the name of a callback isn't exposed anywhere author visible.

The WebIDL namespace is global, it's a bit better if we call this
something a bit more view-transitions-specific so that other specs don't
rely on it, since UpdateCallback is otherwise very generic.

I don't think this would be a normative change since the name of a
callback isn't exposed anywhere author visible.
@emilio
Copy link
Collaborator Author

emilio commented Aug 22, 2024

cc @nt1m in case there's any objection :)

Copy link
Member

@nt1m nt1m left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator

@noamr noamr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@emilio emilio merged commit dff3cfb into w3c:main Aug 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants