Skip to content

Conversation

@josepharhar
Copy link
Contributor

This was discussed here: #10440

This was discussed here: w3c#10440
Copy link
Member

@dbaron dbaron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks mostly fine. A few comments below.


The ''::picker()'' pseudo-element only matches when the <a>originating
element</a> supports <a>base appearance</a> and has a popup picker. The
specified <<ident>> must also match the unique picker name of the
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should probably be defining the term "unique picker name" (for other specs to reference), unless you think it should be defined somewhere else.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. Do you think that HTML should define the mapping?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I think HTML should define it.

@josepharhar josepharhar changed the title Define ::picker() [css-pseudo-4] Define ::picker() Sep 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants