Skip to content

[css-view-transitions-2] Editorial: fix a few nits for WD publishing #11200

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 3 additions & 4 deletions css-view-transitions-2/Overview.bs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ An '':active-view-transition'' pseudo-class matches the [=document element=] whe

### The '':active-view-transition-type()'' pseudo-class ### {#the-active-view-transition-type-pseudo}

The <dfn id='active-view-transition-type-pseudo'>:active-view-transition-type()</dfn> pseudo-class applies to the root element of the document, if it has a matching [=active view transition=].
The <dfn id="active-view-transition-type-pseudo">:active-view-transition-type()</dfn> pseudo-class applies to the root element of the document, if it has a matching [=active view transition=].
It has the following syntax definition:

<pre class=prod>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ li {

## Additions to 'view-transition-name' ## {#additions-to-vt-name}

In addition to the existing values, the 'view-transition-name' also accepts an <dfn for=view-transition-name type=value export>auto</dfn> keyword.
In addition to the existing values, the 'view-transition-name' also accepts an <dfn for=view-transition-name export>auto</dfn> keyword.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would that be a problem to add the following before this line?

<pre class="propdef partial">
Name: view-transition-name
New values: auto
</pre>

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oups, too late. Later then =)

To resolve the [=used value=] of 'view-transition-name' for |element|:
1. Let |computed| be the [=computed value=] of 'view-transition-name'.
1. If |computed| is <css>none</css>, return null.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1482,12 +1482,11 @@ Changes from <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/WD-css-view-transitions-2-20240
* First pass at layered capture (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10585">#10585</a>)
* Allow transitions when traversing into a document that was created using cross-origin redirects (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11063">#11063</a>#11063)
* Clarify a few nesting details (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10780">#10780</a> and <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10633">#10633</a>)
* Allow `auto` as a keyword (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8320">#8320</a>)
* Allow `auto` as a keyword for 'view-transition-name' (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8320">#8320</a>)
* Clarify timeout behavior for inbound view transition (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10800">#10800</a>)
* When hiding the document, and inbound cross-document view transition should be skipped. (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9822">#9822</a>)
* Rename UpdateCallback to something more specific.
* Clarify that CSSViewTransitionRule returns an empty string for invalid/missing navigation descriptor (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10654">#10654</a>)
* Initial spec for nested view transitions (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10334">#10334</a>)
* `view-transition-class` is a tree-scoped name (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10529">#10529</a>)
* Fix typo: if => of
* Stop extending CSSRule with obsolete pattern (See <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10606">#10606</a>)