Skip to content

[css-ui-4] Clarify the applicability of the caret-* properties #11373

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

@frivoal frivoal commented Dec 14, 2024

See #11335

Copy link
Contributor

@schenney-chromium schenney-chromium left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Florian. It's a significant improvement and will help me in moving the implementation forward.

frivoal and others added 3 commits March 25, 2025 11:21
The 'caret-color', 'caret-animation', and 'caret-shape' properties
give the author some amount of control over the appearance of the [=caret=].

Elements are considered to <dfn>accept input</dfn>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In order to respect #5303 (comment), text may also be considered to accept input and then these properties should apply to it.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<div contenteditable>
  <span style="display: contents; caret-color: magenta">aaaaaaa</span>
</div>

Copy link
Collaborator

@emilio emilio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Accept input" is really broad (all elements accept pointer input or so, right?). Probably "Accept text input" or "accept keyboard input"?

@astearns astearns removed the Agenda+ label Apr 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
css-ui-4 Current Work
Projects
Status: Regular agenda
Status: Regular agenda items
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants