Skip to content

Conversation

@graouts
Copy link
Contributor

@graouts graouts commented Mar 3, 2025

While most animation-* CSS properties should not have an effect once a CSSAnimation object has had its effect property set via the bindings, the animation-timeline property, like the animation-play-state and animation-name properties, should not follow that pattern since it is relevant to the animation and not the animation effect.

The relevant WPT test is updated in web-platform-tests/wpt#51057.

…o bet set via `animation-timeline`

While most `animation-*` CSS properties should _not_ have an effect once a `CSSAnimation` object has had its `effect` property set via the bindings, the `animation-timeline`, like the `animation-play-state` and `animation-name` properties, should not follow that pattern since it is relevant to the _animation_ and not the animation _effect_.

The relevant WPT test is updated in web-platform-tests/wpt#51057.
Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good modulo serial comma and missing closing apostrophe.

Co-authored-by: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
@graouts graouts merged commit 949f818 into main Mar 3, 2025
1 check passed
@graouts graouts deleted the css-animation-timeline-set-via-css-after-setting-effect branch March 3, 2025 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants