[css-backgrounds-4] Defined interaction of border-area and text values for background-clip
#12739
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Loirooriol
reviewed
Sep 5, 2025
css-backgrounds-4/Overview.bs
Outdated
| </dl> | ||
|
|
||
| If both ''background-clip/border-area'' and ''background-clip/text'' are specified, | ||
| the background is painted as a union of the two areas. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To follow the existing pattern
Suggested change
| the background is painted as a union of the two areas. | |
| the background is painted within (clipped to) the union of these two areas. |
…alues for `background-clip`
37742fb to
7f97428
Compare
Loirooriol
approved these changes
Sep 5, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In #12738 I missed to define what happens when both
border-areaandtextare defined forbackground-clip, as @Loirooriol immediately pointed out.The minutes of the call suggest the consensus was to do a union. So I added this note.
Sebastian