[css-color-4] consistently name color-mod()

[jonathantneal]

Uses the color-mod() function name consistently in order to avoid confusion with the color() function.

Resolves #868

[praveenpuglia]

I see this being merged but..
here - https://www.w3.org/TR/css-color-4/#funcdef-color-mod

I still see inconsistencies.
Example -
Example 11 in the spec uses the word color and not color-mod as function name.

Will this be updated later or something?

[AmeliaBR]

@praveenpuglia Merging a commit into the master branch automatically updates the editor's draft at https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-4/

The "TR" link on w3.org is updated less frequently, after a formal process with the W3C.

[praveenpuglia]

But the draft only has a link to color-mod function which redirects to the TR page. This seems confusing. Couldn't the latest version live in the editor's draft instead of pointing to the TR?

[AmeliaBR]

Ah, it looks like the entire color-mod proposal was removed (while waiting for a major syntax re-writing) in 034b063#diff-4dcdf0ecb00e997ce9e5b7d522a0cb62

But one reference remained by accident, and because it no longer had any definition in the same file to link to, it was automatically linked to the last TR definition.

Could you file a separate issue, and tag @tabatkins in it?

[praveenpuglia]

Sure! :)