Skip to content

Conversation

@ChumpChief
Copy link
Member

Addresses #326

Intro reworded to discuss more of the "why" -- why current default behavior exists and why authors would want to opt-out. Added 2 scenarios -- one for fully responsive using viewport and one partially responsive using @Viewport and @media. The examples use the current syntax for now, if/when syntax changes are made they can be updated at that time.

@ChumpChief ChumpChief changed the title Adds motivating scenarios and rewording of intro [css-device-adapt] Adds motivating scenarios and rewording of intro Jul 18, 2016
</body>
</html>
</pre>
</div>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comment as the intro. Maybe this spec should normatively define the meta tag. But for now it doesn't, and I think we should resolve on that before adding examples that rely on it.

@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented Jul 19, 2016

Good rewording on the intro, but I kind of disagree with putting examples about the meta viewport and calling it out in the intro while the spec doesn't informatively define it. It probably should, but for now it doesn't. (see comments on the diff).

&lt;head>
&lt;title>My Site&lt;/title>
&lt;style>
@viewport { width: device-width; }
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be @viewport { width: auto; }. width: device-width was removed from the spec quite a while back.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated!

@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented Jul 20, 2016

Intro looks good now. There's a minor fix to add in the first example, and then we're good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants