Skip to content

Conversation

@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

@frivoal frivoal commented Oct 8, 2020

This is not meant to change the expected behavior, however the original text was not very clearly phrased, hence this rewrite.

This is an attempt to solve #4931, currently written against level 2, but to be back ported to the L1 REC if we like it.

@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

frivoal commented Oct 8, 2020

Also note this commented out line in the source: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/5596/files#diff-5832b51ac3ccd578073f26e6b031fa9eR532, which would allow us to let other spec opt into excluding some properties from the sizing as if empty phase.

This is not meant to change the expected behavior,
however the original text was not very clearly phrased,
hence this rewrite.
@frivoal frivoal force-pushed the contain-4931-option-alpha branch from 1139264 to dfbcfc7 Compare October 21, 2020 09:40
@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

frivoal commented Oct 21, 2020

Closing in favor of #5643 the same thing rebased on the latest master branch.

@frivoal frivoal closed this Oct 21, 2020
@frivoal frivoal deleted the contain-4931-option-alpha branch October 21, 2020 10:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant