Skip to content

Conversation

@shinglyu
Copy link
Contributor

@shinglyu shinglyu commented Nov 8, 2016

Fixes #671. In the old version this case was specified, but dropped while changing from a table to a paragraph.

r? @dbaron

Fixes w3c#671. In the [old version](https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/25641c92d33f) this case was specified, but dropped while changing from a table to a paragraph.

r? @dbaron
@dbaron
Copy link
Member

dbaron commented Nov 8, 2016

Er, the github notification I got pointed to a commit in Shing's repository and gave me no hint whatsoever that the comment I made on the commit would show up as a comment on a pull request in a different repository, or even that such a pull request existed!

So, anyway, /cc @tabatkins

@shinglyu
Copy link
Contributor Author

shinglyu commented Nov 9, 2016

From my side, the comment shows up in both my fork and this PR.

@tabatkins
Copy link
Member

It wasn't intentionally dropped; it was intended that this was covered by the first clause - the min() of a value and something that doesn't exist is the value.

That said, I have nothing against making this more explicit. Merging.

@tabatkins tabatkins merged commit 03cead7 into w3c:master Nov 22, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants