Tipo about lime

[scientificware]

I suspect typos in example 4 and example 26.

[css-spec-shortname-1] Brief description which should also include the #issuenum-or-URL and/or link to relevant CSSWG minutes.

Copy the above line into the Title and replace with the relevant details. Fill in any additional details here. See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md for more info.

[dbaron]

I think the second of these two edits would be better left the way it is now; "a lime green" is better than "a lime". The first edit is probably OK either way.

[w3cbot]

dbaron marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.

[scientificware]

Thanks @dbaron,
Yes you are right, but it's a bit ambiguous.
Maybe we could we consider a "lime" color.

[svgeesus]

First edit is good, second edit (a "lime" color) is worse and should be left as-is

[svgeesus]

Yes you are right, but it's a bit ambiguous.

Not at all. lime is a named color; "a lime green" is a description of a class of colors.

[scientificware]

@svgeesus I presume you are talking about example 26.

I think, I understand what you mean.
I was confused because "limegreen" is also a color name.
And there are no other references on class names in the document.
The purpose of this example is just to encode the same color. So why associate a class name?
Sorry for insisting.

Thanks for your review.

Regards.

[svgeesus]

Class as in "category", not class as in "the class attribute".

[svgeesus]

I presume you are talking about example 26

Example 26 is about srgb-linear. I assume you mean example 11 which is the one affected by your first commit?

[scientificware]

@svgeesus really sorry, I was wrong, it was example 9.
Thanks for approval.