Skip to content

Conversation

@SebastianZ
Copy link
Contributor

What the title says. See #8168 for the reasoning.

Fixes #8168

@SebastianZ SebastianZ requested a review from tabatkins December 1, 2022 22:45
@SebastianZ SebastianZ force-pushed the selectors-4-at-risk-list branch from cb0395d to 05b1238 Compare December 12, 2022 22:03
@SebastianZ SebastianZ merged commit 448f9a6 into w3c:main Dec 12, 2022
Abstract: Selectors Level 4 describes the selectors that already exist in [[!SELECT]], and further introduces new selectors for CSS and other languages that may need them.
At Risk: the column combinator
At Risk: the '':read-write'' pseudo-class
At Risk: the '':has()'' pseudo-class
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems that :has() is still there in the at-risk list after this merge?

jakearchibald pushed a commit to jakearchibald/csswg-drafts that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[selectors-4] Update at-risk info for :has(), :read-write(), and :blank()

2 participants