Skip to content

Conversation

@myakura
Copy link
Contributor

@myakura myakura commented Feb 7, 2023

Per #7603 (comment) the group resolved to use present tense for the event and interface.

Since then, Mozilla and Chrome both implemented the interface under the new name.
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6095dabf5574
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9851571ecb54c47a205b2321006577b9799c0ea3

This updates both the event name and interface to reflect the resolution and to match implementation.

…tVisibilityAutoStateChange`

Per #7603 (comment) the group resolved to use present tense for the event and interface.

Since then, Mozilla and Chrome both implemented the interface under the new name.
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6095dabf5574
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9851571ecb54c47a205b2321006577b9799c0ea3

This updates both the event name and interface to reflect the resolution and to match implementation.
@myakura myakura force-pushed the rename-contentvisibilityautostatechanged-to-contentvisibilityautostatechange branch from 45d941a to 35e894e Compare February 7, 2023 22:18
@plinss
Copy link
Member

plinss commented Feb 15, 2023

Can someone please review and merge or close this PR? This is one of those that play havoc with the mercurial conversion (due to the force push getting the hashes out of sync).

@myakura In the future, please fork the repo and create your branches and PRs from your private fork instead of in the main repo. Thanks.

@tabatkins tabatkins merged commit 83910c8 into main Feb 15, 2023
@tabatkins tabatkins deleted the rename-contentvisibilityautostatechanged-to-contentvisibilityautostatechange branch February 15, 2023 16:39
@tabatkins
Copy link
Member

Merged, I expect the only reason it wasn't was because of the IPR issue.

I thought we were killing the mercurial bridge, fwiw?

myakura added a commit to myakura/mdn-content that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2023
CSSWG updated the draft and had the new URL for the event and corresponding definitions.
w3c/csswg-drafts#8413

Signed-off-by: Masataka Yakura <masataka.yakura@gmail.com>
myakura added a commit to myakura/browser-compat-data that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2023
…r to W3C specs mirror on GitHub Pages

The CSSWG updaed the css-contain-2 editors' draft to incorporate name change I raised in mdn#18847
w3c/csswg-drafts#8413

The TR/contain-2 version updates less than Editors' drafts on GH. So I switched to the GH Pages link.
teoli2003 added a commit to mdn/content that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2023
* update link to cotentvisibilityautostatechangeevent spec

CSSWG updated the draft and had the new URL for the event and corresponding definitions.
w3c/csswg-drafts#8413

Signed-off-by: Masataka Yakura <masataka.yakura@gmail.com>

* Remove useless spec link in the prose

---------

Signed-off-by: Masataka Yakura <masataka.yakura@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jean-Yves Perrier <jypenator@gmail.com>
teoli2003 pushed a commit to mdn/browser-compat-data that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2023
…r to W3C specs mirror on GitHub Pages (#18950)

* update spec link for `contentvisibilityautostatechange` event to refer to W3C specs mirror on GitHub Pages

The CSSWG updaed the css-contain-2 editors' draft to incorporate name change I raised in #18847
w3c/csswg-drafts#8413

The TR/contain-2 version updates less than Editors' drafts on GH. So I switched to the GH Pages link.

* fix speclink to the `ContentVisibilityAutoStateChangeEvent` ctor.
pmeenan pushed a commit to pmeenan/content that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2023
* update link to cotentvisibilityautostatechangeevent spec

CSSWG updated the draft and had the new URL for the event and corresponding definitions.
w3c/csswg-drafts#8413

Signed-off-by: Masataka Yakura <masataka.yakura@gmail.com>

* Remove useless spec link in the prose

---------

Signed-off-by: Masataka Yakura <masataka.yakura@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jean-Yves Perrier <jypenator@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants